Whether people working artistic fields ought to be allowed to display their own initiatives in any forms they desire or not has always gained public interest in comtemporary society. While I agree that freedom in creating artworks plays an important role in producing masterpieces, I gravivate towards the viewpoint that cencorship from governing bodies and the local is also necessary.
There are several logial arguments as to why making works of arts should be without limitation. First and foremost, thanks to the freedom in producing any creative ideas, the results of this process become attractive and goreous to satisfy the aesthetic and rereational needs of the art enthusiastic. For instance, to the psyhology or horror or science fiction, filmmakers only bring into those films the real people, real conversation, the true inner character, but their imaginations which are beyond any limits. Secondly, in this civilized world, imagination plays an indispensable part in fostering the rapid advancement of technology. Take design in leonardo de vinci’s artworks as salient example. The plane models drawn in the most renowned italian’s artist’s paintings, despite beyond the understanding of the normal people, his ideas facilliate the invention of a real aeroplane, which help human beings fly in the air nowadays.
On the other hand, despite the undeniable benefits of freedom in creating artworks, I would argue that in some aspects, artists should be monitored. The first argument is that there are many creators go beyound religious limits in their works which generate aggresstiveness amongst the public. For example, some raps offend a long-existed religion, buddhism. Consequently, it creates political and social chaos in the general. Another explanation would e that movies with violence and nudity could negatively influence on the natural development of youngsters. Therefore, before releasing any artworks to the public, they should be checked by the authorities and the community to ensure it follow our moral and religious standards
All in all, with the arguments provided above, I reaffirm that notwithstanding the benefits from artist’s freedom in creating values, in some cases the art of works should be supervised before publishing.
Whether
people
working artistic fields ought to be
allowed
to display their
own
initiatives in any forms they desire or not has always gained public interest in
comtemporary
society. While I
agree
that
freedom
in creating
artworks
plays an
important
role in producing masterpieces, I
gravivate
towards the viewpoint that
cencorship
from governing bodies and the local is
also
necessary.
There are several
logial
arguments as to why making works of arts should be without limitation.
First
and foremost, thanks to the
freedom
in producing any creative
ideas
, the results of this process become attractive and
goreous
to satisfy the aesthetic and
rereational
needs of the art enthusiastic.
For instance
, to the
psyhology
or horror or science fiction, filmmakers
only
bring into those films the real
people
, real conversation, the true inner character,
but
their imaginations which are beyond any limits.
Secondly
, in this civilized world, imagination plays an indispensable part in fostering the rapid advancement of technology. Take design in
leonardo
de
vinci
’s
artworks
as salient example. The
plane
models drawn in the most renowned
italian
’s artist’s paintings, despite beyond the understanding of the normal
people
, his
ideas
facilliate
the invention of a real
aeroplane
, which
help
human beings
fly
in the air nowadays.
On the other hand
, despite the undeniable benefits of
freedom
in creating
artworks
, I would argue that in
some
aspects, artists should
be monitored
. The
first
argument is that there are
many
creators go
beyound
religious limits in their works which generate
aggresstiveness
amongst the public.
For example
,
some
raps offend a long-existed religion,
buddhism
.
Consequently
, it creates political and social chaos in the general. Another explanation would e that movies with violence and nudity could
negatively
influence on the natural development of youngsters.
Therefore
,
before
releasing any
artworks
to the public, they should be
checked
by the authorities and the community to ensure it follow our moral and religious standards
All in all, with the arguments provided above, I reaffirm that notwithstanding the benefits from artist’s
freedom
in creating values, in
some
cases the art of works should
be supervised
before
publishing.