Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

One Child Policy has been noted as an effective way to help contain the overflow of population.

One Child Policy has been noted as an effective way to help contain the overflow of population. xODY6
Policies have a phenomenal power towards civilians, both positive and negative. The one child policy is a birth planning procedure that restricts couples from having more than one child. It was first prefaced by the Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping in the Republic of China from 1979 through 2015. Over the years, it gained a discriminative reputation for its cruel, brutal, and unethical methods. The one-child policy in China, which stirred up a lot of controversy in social media, was aimed to aid the rapid population growth. China was facing a significant problem in which it had to feed 22% of the world with just 7% of its land. Nevertheless, I believe that the mechanism of this procedure adds up to the existent issues while barely achieving its initial aim. Firstly, I would like to bring up the injustice towards families facing the protocol who not only will get their infants taken away, but also get harsh treatment. Back when the policy was active in China, many grieving parents shared stories of losing their children in the face of the then-active one child policy. Washington Post journalist Simon Denyer interviewed people who experienced the horror in hopes to discover what they underwent. Amongst many cases, a man who went through the protocol in China described it as uncivil. Afterward, he led on with details of how a group of people barged into their home, grabbed his wife like she was a pig, and put the baby in a plastic bag to be buried alive on a nearby hill. The family shouldn't have to put up with such a traumatic encounter that eminently defies their human rights. If the one child policy becomes globally implemented, there would undoubtedly be a disparity of gender ratio, possibly as drastic as China's gender imbalance at the time of the policy in which two-thirds of the population were men. Since only one child is allowed, families would most likely choose to abandon girls rather than boys because of their ability to carry their surname for generations to come and the belief that they will grow up to have more potential in money-making. The imbalance in gender will cause problems since it will be increasingly difficult for a man to find a wife to bear him children and maintain the family line. Another significant issue that may come along with the one-child policy is the increase in abortion and infanticide rates. Formerly in China, the number of abortions was equivalent to an estimated nine folds of other countries. Moreover, the use of infanticides jumped a whopping 60% from its initial digits. The birth rate quickly depleted from 2. 75 births per woman to 1. 62. The likelihood that a similar case will take place if this policy were to be applied to other countries is undeniably high. Furthermore, an issue that may surface is the government targeting the urban poor more rather than the wealthy. This issue has happened before and is most likely to happen again. The wealthy could easily pay the fine for having multiple children. On the other hand, it is not that simple for the impecunious. If they cannot afford to pay the fine for having additional children, there is a possibility that their property would be seized. This will lead to major issues in the likes of child abandonment and poverty. Not only will this policy be a detriment to citizens but also the government themselves. Financially speaking, enforcement policies and procedures require a lot of money. Even after citizens pay the fine, it will still wound up to a significant financial loss. Based on China's history with this policy, the government's intake from the fines never fully recouped the expenses of the one-child policy. All in all, it has been proven by China that the one-child policy was a failure of a procedure. I believe that it would be entirely indecent to replicate the same mistake in other countries. Instead, I think that overpopulation should be handled with subtler measures such as spreading the importance of family planning. The prior-existing idea of giving incentives to families who abide by the policy is efficacious if precluding the part where they repudiated the additional child.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Policies
have a phenomenal power towards civilians, both
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
. The one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
child
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
policy
is a birth planning
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
procedure
that restricts couples from having more than one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
child
. It was
first
prefaced by the Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping in the Republic of China from 1979 through 2015. Over the years, it gained a
Possible spelling mistake found.
discriminative
reputation for its cruel, brutal, and unethical methods. The one-child
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
policy
in China, which stirred up
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
controversy in social media,
was aimed
to aid the rapid population growth. China was facing a significant problem in which it had to feed 22% of the world with
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
7% of its land.
Nevertheless
, I believe that the mechanism of this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
procedure
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
adds
up to the existent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
issues
while
barely
achieving its initial aim.

Firstly
, I would like to bring up the injustice towards
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
families
facing the protocol
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
their infants taken away,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
harsh treatment. Back when the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
policy
was active in China,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
grieving parents shared stories of losing their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
in the face of the then-active one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
child
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
policy
. Washington Post journalist Simon
Possible spelling mistake found.
Denyer
interviewed
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
experienced the horror in hopes to discover what they underwent. Amongst
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
cases, a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
man
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
went through the protocol in China
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
described
it as uncivil. Afterward, he led on with
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
details
of how a group of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
barged into their home, grabbed his wife like she was a pig, and put the baby in a plastic bag to
be buried
alive on a nearby hill. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
shouldn't
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
put up with such a traumatic encounter that
eminently
defies their human rights.

If the one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
child
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
policy
becomes globally implemented, there would
undoubtedly
be a disparity of gender ratio,
possibly
as drastic as China's gender imbalance at the time of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
policy
in which two-thirds of the population were
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
men
. Since
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
child
is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
allowed
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
families
would most likely choose to abandon girls
rather
than boys
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of their ability to carry their surname for generations to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
come
and the belief that they will grow up to have more potential in money-making. The imbalance in gender will cause problems since it will be
increasingly
difficult for a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
man
to find a wife to bear him
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
and maintain the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
line.

Another significant
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
issue
that may
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
come
along with the one-child
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
policy
is the increase in abortion and infanticide rates.
Formerly
in China, the number of abortions was equivalent to an estimated nine folds of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
countries.
Moreover
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of infanticides jumped a whopping 60% from its initial digits. The birth rate
quickly
depleted from 2. 75 births per woman to 1. 62. The likelihood that a similar case will take place if this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
policy
were to
be applied
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
countries is
undeniably
high.

Furthermore
, an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
issue
that may surface is the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
targeting the urban poor more
rather
than the wealthy. This
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
issue
has happened
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
and is most likely to happen again. The wealthy could
easily
pay the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fine
for having multiple
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
. On the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand, it is not that simple for the impecunious. If they cannot afford to pay the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fine
for having additional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
, there is a possibility that their property would
be seized
. This will lead to major
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
issues
in the likes of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
child
abandonment and poverty.

Not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
will this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
policy
be a detriment to citizens
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
themselves.
Financially
speaking, enforcement
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
policies
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
procedures
require
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
money. Even after citizens pay the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fine
, it will
still
wound up to a significant financial loss. Based on China's history with this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
policy
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
's intake from the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fines
never
fully
recouped the expenses of the one-child policy.

All in all, it has
been proven
by China that the one-child
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
policy
was a failure of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
procedure
. I believe that it would be
entirely
indecent to replicate the same mistake in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
countries.
Instead
, I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that overpopulation should
be handled
with subtler measures such as spreading the importance of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
family
planning. The prior-existing
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
of giving incentives to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
families
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
abide by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
policy
is efficacious if precluding the part where they repudiated the additional
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
child
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay One Child Policy has been noted as an effective way to help contain the overflow of population.

Essay
  American English
7 paragraphs
702 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts