Nowadays, with the development of entertainment, there are many ideas about the public figure. While some people reckon that daily life of celebrities should be professed, others give the idea that the private information of them should be limited and protected.
On the one hand, the public life will make a variety of beneficial consequent for both fans and famous people. Take Kim SeonHo, a Korean artist is an example, He addressed many adverse problems when he was accused by wrong news. As a result, the media was explained for him with the authentic proof. Through this case, the possible publicity of media will play a pivotal role in removing false news. Besides that, the general public have more right details about the people who they devotee. They won't pay much money or waste time for the people that live artificially different the things they show on tv.
On the other hand, when the life of famous people is protected, that makes them a host of advantages. First of all, they will have more private space to do many activities like a normal people. The fact that almost celebrities are under much pressure from the public. When their information is security, they will feel more comfortable and it’s also a pice of cake for them to go outside and decompress. Moreover, in many cases media also gives false information and they had to endure a lot of criticism. That is unbalance for them who don’t do the wrong things but they still receive numerous negative comments.
In conclusion, each individual has various choices, however for me, the news of public people should be limited and controlled. They should have interest for this.
Nowadays, with the development of entertainment, there are
many
ideas
about the
public
figure. While
some
people
reckon that daily life of celebrities should
be professed
, others give the
idea
that the private information of them should
be limited
and protected.
On the one hand, the
public
life will
make
a variety of beneficial consequent for both fans and
famous
people
. Take Kim
SeonHo
, a Korean artist is an example, He addressed
many
adverse problems when he
was accused
by
wrong
news.
As a result
, the media was
explained
for him with the authentic proof. Through this case, the possible publicity of media will play a pivotal role in removing false news.
Besides
that, the general
public
have more right
details
about the
people
who
they devotee
. They won't pay much money or waste time for the
people
that
live
artificially
different
the things they
show
on
tv
.
On the other hand
, when the life of
famous
people
is protected
, that
makes
them a host of advantages.
First of all
, they will have more private space to do
many
activities like a normal
people
. The fact that almost celebrities are under much pressure from the
public
. When their information is security, they will feel more comfortable and it’s
also
a
pice
of cake for them to go outside and decompress.
Moreover
, in
many
cases media
also
gives false
information and
they had to endure
a lot of
criticism.
That is
unbalance for them who don’t do the
wrong
things
but
they
still
receive numerous
negative
comments.
In conclusion
, each individual has various choices,
however
for me, the news of
public
people
should
be limited
and controlled. They should have interest for this.