Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand, agree or disagree?

Some argue that nuclear power should be adopted as the major energy source to satisfy the world’s rocketing demand for electricity. In my opinion, nuclear power is indeed a relatively more appropriate choice, however, there are also potential danger involved. Nuclear power has a major environmental benefit. Many nations have been using nuclear energy instead of coal-fired alternative sources to generate electricity, which is positive to the air quality and the climate, because nuclear plants do not emit gases conducive to global warming, acid rain, or urban smog. For example, in 2013, Chinese nuclear plants have avoided fifty million tons of CO2 emission that would result if the electricity were produced by fossil fuels. In addition, nuclear energy has high productivity and no climatically and geographical limitations. Nuclear reactors, which only require a relatively small amount of land, utilize a small quantity of feedstock input (Uranium) to generate huge amount of energy continuously. By contrast, to obtain an equivalent renewable energy, an extensive solar farm or countless wind turbines and a much longer time are required, furthermore, these power plants have to be built on certain landforms and operated in suitable weathers. However, it is undeniable that nuclear plants may be dangerous in some circumstances. The principal risks associated with nuclear power arise from radiation, which can penetrate deep inside human body to damage biological cells and thereby initiate a cancer. Nuclear leak may also occur during catastrophic natural disasters or because of human error. In 1986, a nuclear plant in Chernobyl, Ukraine experienced a tragic explosion due to operator error. This resulted in enormous international spread of nuclear leak, which is still radioactive after decades. In conclusion, although the world should accept nuclear power as an energy source which is superior to other ones in many ways, it should also be noted that there are risks of this technology.
Some
argue that nuclear
power
should
be adopted
as the major
energy
source to satisfy the world’s rocketing demand for electricity. In my opinion, nuclear
power
is
indeed
a
relatively
more appropriate choice,
however
, there are
also
potential
danger
involved.

Nuclear
power
has a major environmental benefit.
Many
nations have been using nuclear
energy
instead
of coal-fired alternative sources to generate electricity, which is
positive
to the air quality and the climate,
because
nuclear
plants
do not emit gases conducive to global warming, acid rain, or urban smog.
For example
, in 2013, Chinese nuclear
plants
have avoided fifty million tons of CO2 emission that would result if the electricity
were produced
by fossil fuels.

In addition
, nuclear
energy
has high productivity and no
climatically
and geographical limitations. Nuclear reactors, which
only
require a
relatively
small
amount of land, utilize a
small
quantity of feedstock input (Uranium) to generate huge amount of
energy
continuously
. By contrast, to obtain an equivalent renewable
energy
, an extensive solar farm or countless wind turbines and a much longer time
are required
,
furthermore
, these
power
plants
have to
be built
on certain landforms and operated in suitable weathers.

However
, it is undeniable that nuclear
plants
may be
dangerous
in
some
circumstances. The principal
risks
associated with nuclear
power
arise from radiation, which can penetrate deep inside human body to damage biological cells and thereby initiate a cancer. Nuclear leak may
also
occur during catastrophic natural disasters or
because
of human error. In 1986, a nuclear
plant
in Chernobyl, Ukraine experienced a tragic explosion due to operator error. This resulted in enormous international spread of nuclear leak, which is
still
radioactive after decades.

In conclusion
, although the world should accept nuclear
power
as an
energy
source which is superior to other ones in
many
ways, it should
also
be noted
that there are
risks
of this technology.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand, agree or disagree?

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
310 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts