Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand. Do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued that nuclear power is a better alternative to satisfy the world’s escalating demand for energy. While I accept the observable advantages of nuclear energy, I believe that there are also potential dangers involved. Nuclear power has several benefits for the environment. First of all, it is considered to be a relatively sustainable source of energy. Nuclear plants operate with very high efficiency, with a global average capacity factor of 80. 5%. To exemplify, nuclear power plants deliver electricity 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, irrespective of weather and seasons. As well as reducing greenhouse gas emissions, nuclear generation helps reduce air pollution, responsible for 6. 5 million deaths globally each year. On the other hand, the use of energy also has some negative impacts which could outweigh its merits. To commence with, accidental radiation leak is one of the most severe drawbacks of nuclear power. Although it is taken over by governments, if safety measured failed, it would result in detrimental effects associated with ecosystem and biodiversity. For illustration, the process of mining and refining uranium has not been clean. Apparently, transporting nuclear fuel to and from plants involves a pollution hazard. In conclusion, I do agree with the opinion that nuclear energy should be used as an effective alternative to meet global needs. However, the downsides of nuclear power exploitation should not be forgotten.
It is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
argued that nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
is a better alternative to satisfy the world’s escalating demand for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
. While I accept the observable advantages of nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
, I believe that there are
also
potential
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
dangers
involved.

Nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
has several benefits for the environment.
This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".
First of all
, it
is considered
to be a
relatively
sustainable source of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
. Nuclear plants operate with
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
high efficiency, with a global average capacity factor of 80. 5%. To exemplify, nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
plants deliver electricity 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, irrespective of weather and seasons.
As well
as reducing greenhouse gas emissions, nuclear generation
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helps
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
air pollution, responsible for 6. 5 million deaths globally each year.

On the other hand
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
also
has
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
impacts which could outweigh its merits. To commence with, accidental radiation leak is one of the most severe drawbacks of nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
. Although it
is taken
over by
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
, if safety measured failed, it would result in detrimental effects associated with ecosystem and biodiversity. For illustration, the process of mining and refining uranium has not been clean.
Apparently
, transporting nuclear fuel to and from plants involves a pollution hazard.

In conclusion
, I do
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with the opinion that nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
as an effective alternative to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
meet
global needs.
However
, the downsides of nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
power
exploitation should not
be forgotten
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
231 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts