There is a debatable issue at the moment that some people think that purchasing a plethora of items should be given an incentive to people by countries since it is useful for the state economy. However, the other part of the people believes that more consumption is not good for society. In my opinion, buying more and more products can cause negative aspects for society and the economy.
There are 2 main trends why getting a plethora of outputs is more essential in the state economy. First of all, it boosts up the state budgets and also helps with the opportunities of the best living quality. Take the USA, for example, people purchase more daily and general products than other countries. That is why the state budget is higher, and it helps people to live in good quality. Secondly, it increases the job opportunities that also influence the economy in a good way. It is believed that which country's unemployment rate is lower, it has significant economics. As we know, Japan has a high rank for its improvements, economics related to the low unemployment rate.
On the other hand, some of them believe that the purchasing process of many objects has drawbacks. Consumption a lot demands more money, and it can cause depression for poor people. People intend to earn sufficient money to buy extra things according to this view, they agree to work long hours, even if they work at night, some people have no rest of the time, it causes psychological or healthy problems. Moreover, buying a plethora of products can cause money devaluation, it is the worst thing for countries, societies. Purchasing more and more items demands making a lot of money, and it causes the devaluation of money. In the past, in Germany, it happened, and people burned their money to keep warm.
In conclusion, while others consider that getting more and more products can be useful for the economic issues, but I believe that it has enough drawbacks, and it should be balanced for each country.
There is a debatable issue at the moment that
some
people
think
that purchasing a plethora of items should be
given
an incentive to
people
by
countries
since it is useful for the
state
economy.
However
, the
other
part of the
people
believes that more consumption is not
good
for society. In my opinion, buying more and more
products
can
cause
negative
aspects for society and the economy.
There are 2 main trends why getting a plethora of outputs is more essential in the
state
economy.
First of all
, it boosts up the
state
budgets and
also
helps
with the opportunities of the best living quality. Take the USA,
for example
,
people
purchase
more daily and general
products
than
other
countries
.
That is
why the
state
budget is higher, and it
helps
people
to
live
in
good
quality.
Secondly
, it increases the job opportunities that
also
influence the economy in a
good
way. It
is believed
that which country's unemployment rate is lower, it has significant economics. As we know, Japan has a high rank for its improvements, economics related to the low unemployment rate.
On the
other
hand,
some
of them believe that the purchasing process of
many
objects has drawbacks. Consumption a lot demands more
money
, and it can
cause
depression for poor
people
.
People
intend to earn sufficient
money
to
buy
extra things according to this view, they
agree
to work long hours, even if they work at night,
some
people
have no rest of the time, it
causes
psychological or healthy problems.
Moreover
, buying a plethora of
products
can
cause
money
devaluation, it is the worst thing for
countries
, societies. Purchasing more and more items demands making
a lot of
money
, and it
causes
the devaluation of
money
. In the past, in Germany, it happened, and
people
burned their
money
to
keep
warm.
In conclusion
, while others consider that getting more and more
products
can be useful for the economic issues,
but
I believe that it has
enough
drawbacks, and it should
be balanced
for each
country
.