Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Nowadays it is generally accepted as scientific fact that fossil fuels (such as coal and gas) are harmful for the environment. This is borne out in daily life, for example many countries suffer from serious pollution, which not only reduces people’s quality of life but also creates a lot of additional problems for governments, such as the citizens’ health.

Nowadays it is generally accepted as scientific fact that fossil fuels (such as coal and gas) are harmful for the environment. This is borne out in daily life, for example many countries suffer from serious pollution, which not only reduces people’s quality of life but also creates a lot of additional problems for governments, such as the citizens’ health. V3yD
The climate change is of increasing significance to many people, as you could see at the numerous demonstrations of ‘Fridays for Future’ all over the planet. Thereby, the immediate change of our electricity source from fossil fuels to green resources is an important part of it, as it is generally accepted that coal and gas are harmful to our environment. However, there is also another point of view, suggesting to benefit from the cheap prizes of fossil fuels also the following years. This essay should explain both sides and finally weighing up the pros and cons. In general, the costs for energy produced through coal or gas are indeed comparatively low at the moment. Therefore, some people try to profit from the doubtless existing advantages by using these fossil fuels until they are no longer available, as for a few countries in the world the export of products like coal, oil or gas is the largest factor of their economy. Moreover, it is not just about a few countries, such as Qatar or Saudi Arabia, there are also a large number of concerns, which make most of their money through the trade and editing of these fossil resources. Consequently, an instant change to the much more expensive renewable energy sources had at first several negative aspects to some parts of the economy, but also for the citizens themselves as they have to spend more money. On the contrary, there are urgent warnings of many scientists to modify immediately the way we are living currently and try to avoid as many greenhouse gases as possible due to the climate change to safe the plant, as we know it. Thus renewable energies are a key factor to this development, even if there are high costs at the beginning. Furthermore, it is not possible to get the transformation from one day to another, but the action has to speed up to reduce the dramatic consequences of the global warming. However, rising sea level, more frequent nature disasters and the increasing air pollution are serious dangers to the human. So, if there is no immediate action to reduce the heating up to 1. 5 degree Celsius, the aftermaths will have serious influence in our future life. To sum it up, I am wholeheartedly convinced, that we have to make radical changes right now to save the earth. As a result, we should not harm the planet sustainably for economic benefits in the short term at the expense of our planet. Of course, these changes to renewable energies are not possible to happen overnight, but we have to do it in great steps with high subventions on these green opportunities, to reduce the use of fossil fuels.
The climate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
change
is of increasing significance to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
, as you could
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
at the numerous demonstrations of ‘Fridays for Future’ all over the planet. Thereby, the immediate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
change
of our electricity source from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuels
to green resources is an
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
part of it, as it is
generally
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
accepted
that coal and gas are harmful to our environment.
However
, there is
also
another point of view, suggesting to benefit from the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
cheap
prizes of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuels
also
the following years. This essay should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explain
both sides and
finally
weighing up the pros and cons.

In general
, the costs for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
produced through coal or gas are
indeed
comparatively
low at the moment.
Therefore
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
try to profit from the doubtless existing advantages by using these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuels
until they are no longer available, as for a few countries in the world the export of products like coal, oil or gas is the largest factor of their economy.
Moreover
, it is not
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
about a few countries, such as Qatar or Saudi Arabia, there are
also
Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use "many" or "numerous"
a large number of
concerns, which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
most of their money through the trade and editing of these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossil
resources.
Consequently
, an instant
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
change
to the much more expensive renewable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
sources had at
first
several
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
negative
aspects to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
parts of the economy,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
for the citizens themselves as they
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
spend more money.

On the contrary
, there are urgent warnings of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
scientists to modify immediately the way we are living
currently
and try to avoid as
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
greenhouse gases as possible due to the climate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
change
to safe the plant, as we know it.
Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Thus
renewable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energies
are a key factor to this development, even if there are high costs at the beginning.
Furthermore
, it is not possible to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
the transformation from one day to another,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
the action
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
has to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
speed up
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the dramatic consequences of the global warming.
However
, rising sea level, more frequent nature disasters and the increasing air pollution are serious
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
dangers
to the human.
“So , if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
So, if
there is no immediate action to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the heating up to 1. 5 degree Celsius, the aftermaths will have serious influence in our future life.

To sum it up, I am
wholeheartedly
convinced, that we
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
radical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
changes
right
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
to save the earth.
As a result
, we should not harm the planet
sustainably
for economic benefits in the short term at the expense of our planet.
Of course
, these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
changes
to renewable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energies
are not possible to happen overnight,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
we
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
do it in great steps with high subventions on these green opportunities, to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fossil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuels
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Nowadays it is generally accepted as scientific fact that fossil fuels (such as coal and gas) are harmful for the environment. This is borne out in daily life, for example many countries suffer from serious pollution, which not only reduces people’s quality of life but also creates a lot of additional problems for governments, such as the citizens’ health.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
452 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Nowadays it is generally accepted as scientific fact that fossil fuels (such as coal and gas) are harmful for the environment. This is borne out in daily life, for example many countries suffer from serious pollution, which not only reduces people’s quality of life but also creates a lot of additional problems for governments, such as the citizens’ health.