Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Nowadays animals are widely used to develop new medicine and to test the safety.Some people say that it is a positive effect.And other say that it is negative.And it should banned.Discuss both views..

Nowadays animals are widely used to develop new medicine and to test the safety. Some people say that it is a positive effect. And other say that it is negative. And it should banned. . 7p5Xb
There have been ongoing bedates wheater, who individuals are using the animals for testing purpose it should be banned. However, other masses say that it is a valuable decision for human beings. Therefore, previously arriving on a decision both views will be discuss in upcoming paragraphs. To begin with, there are various reasons why must ban on experiment on animals. Predominately, all species have the right to live on the earth. Consequently, masses should avoid this work. Owing to the fact that, masses can lose these animals, and after they can also lost their natural habitat. To cite an example, nowadays doctors are using the mouse and money for experiment. Besides this, in some Hindu religious people give huge respect of these animals. Even that, animals have also feeling and pain. Thus, it must be banned. Probing ahead, there are a number of causes testing on wildlife is beneficial for community. Firstly, experiment can positive at on some point. For instance, in 2021 all masses were worried for COVID-19. Due to the fact, that hassle was extremely dangerous for everyone. In that situation, doctors searched vaccines for safety of people. In that time, directly tested on humans, which could kill all over the world. Consequently, scientists had not option for tested on wildlife. As a result, it experiment was succeed, and doctors saved life of citizens. Furthermore, animals body have preserve the any medicine as compared to people. Like, in Canada doctors believe that moneys have huge harmonies for experiment, which can save all over the world. To recapitulate, no doubt both points are correct. On the contrary, I believe that searching on animals are significant for everyone. Due the fact that, it is best way to test new drugs.
There have been ongoing
Possible spelling mistake found.
bedates
Possible spelling mistake found.
wheater
, who individuals are using the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
for testing purpose it should
be banned
.
However
, other masses say that it is a valuable decision for human beings.
Therefore
, previously
The usual proposition after "arriving" is "at" not "on". Did you mean "arriving at"?
arriving on
a decision both views will be
Consider using the past participle "discussed"?
discuss
in upcoming paragraphs.

To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with, there are various reasons why
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
ban on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiment
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
Predominately
, all species have the right to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
on the earth.
Consequently
, masses should avoid this work. Owing to the fact that, masses can lose these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
, and after they can
also
The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: "lose"
lost
their natural habitat. To cite an example, nowadays
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
doctors
are using the mouse and money for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiment
.
Besides
this, in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
Hindu religious
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
give huge respect of these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
. Even that,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
have
also
feeling and pain.
Thus
, it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
be banned
.

Probing ahead, there are a number of causes testing on wildlife is beneficial for community.
Firstly
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiment
can
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
at on
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
point.
For instance
, in 2021 all masses were
The verb 'worry' does not normally take the preposition 'for'. Did you mean "worried about"?
worried for
COVID-19. Due to the fact, that hassle was
extremely
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
dangerous
for everyone. In that situation,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
doctors
searched vaccines for safety of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
. In that time,
directly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
on humans, which could kill all over the world.
Consequently
, scientists had not
Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: "optioned".
option
for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
on wildlife.
As a result
,
It seems that the possessive pronoun "its" fits better in this context. Please verify.
it
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiment
was
Consider using a past participle here: "succeeded".
succeed
, and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
doctors
saved life of citizens.
Furthermore
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
body have
Use past participle here: "preserved".
preserve
the any medicine as compared to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
. Like, in Canada
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
doctors
believe that moneys have huge harmonies for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experiment
, which can save all over the world.

To recapitulate, no doubt both points are correct.
On the contrary
, I believe that searching on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are significant for everyone.
It appears that a preposition is missing after 'Due'.
Due the
fact that, it
A determiner is probably missing here: "is the best".
is best
way to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
new drugs.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Nowadays animals are widely used to develop new medicine and to test the safety. Some people say that it is a positive effect. And other say that it is negative. And it should banned. .

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
290 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Nowadays animals are widely used to develop new medicine and to test the safety.Some people say that it is a positive effect.And other say that it is negative.And it should banned.Discuss both views..