Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines. What extend do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines. What extend nxb1E
Animals are considered as an important part of food chain, so some people think that the some creatures should not used for scientific research; whereas, critics faver that animals should be used for research to save human beings. In my opinion, the later proposal appears to be partinant because without finding medicine, human beings does not exist. Firstly, the main advantage of using animal for testing is to save human life for dangerous disease. During, corona pandemic, if vaccine was not used firstly on critter, then it will result in increase numbers of death of mortal. Due to testing on animals and finding of vaccine or medicine it will reach medical science on top. Let's take an example of plague in 1999, in surat, the vaccine saved many lives. In contrast, it is unethical and morally incorrect to use creature for our own advantage, because they have emotions too; they have to suffer for our own benefits. In addition to this, drugs which can be applied on animals are most of ineffective, so we are unnecessarily exploiting numbers of brute. For instance, thousands of drugs are given to creature out of which one or two drugs are effective. Moreover, other methods are used for finding vaccine or medicine like in-vitro tests in which animals are not used and drugs can be applied on directly DNA, it will save numbers of animals. In conclusion, I think animals can be used for saving humans; whereas, I think If possible used reduction in numbers of animal for testing as well as if possible use in-vitro test.
Animals
are considered
as an
important
part of food chain,
so
some
people
think
that the
some
creatures should not
used
for scientific research; whereas, critics
faver
that
animals
should be
used
for research to save
human
beings. In my opinion, the later proposal appears to be
partinant
because
without finding medicine,
human
beings does not exist.
Firstly
, the main advantage of using
animal
for testing is to save
human
life for
dangerous
disease. During, corona pandemic, if
vaccine
was not
used
firstly
on critter, then it will result in increase
numbers
of death of mortal. Due to testing on
animals
and finding of
vaccine
or medicine it will reach medical science on top.
Let
's take an example of plague in 1999, in
surat
, the
vaccine
saved
many
lives
.
In contrast
, it is unethical and
morally
incorrect to
use
creature for our
own
advantage,
because
they have emotions too; they
have to
suffer for our
own
benefits.
In addition
to this,
drugs
which can
be applied
on
animals
are most of ineffective,
so
we are
unnecessarily
exploiting
numbers
of brute.
For instance
, thousands of
drugs
are
given
to creature out of which one or two
drugs
are effective.
Moreover
, other methods are
used
for finding
vaccine
or medicine like
in-vitro
tests
in which
animals
are not
used
and
drugs
can
be applied
on
directly
DNA, it will save
numbers
of
animals
.
In conclusion
, I
think
animals
can be
used
for saving
humans
; whereas, I
think
If possible
used
reduction in
numbers
of
animal
for testing
as well
as if possible
use
in-vitro
test
.