Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of various products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of various products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Dl6Vo
Some said that the usage of animals in the experimental setting is undeniable more effective compared to the use of non-living things. However, this view is disregarding the animal value as the same living things as humans. I personally strongly disagree with using the animal in the experimental setting. Though undoubtedly that there several reasons why researchers choose to use animals in experimental testing. They claimed that for the new medicine to be approved clinically it is unavoidable to use the animal. As the researchers need to prioritize the safety of the medicine to be used by humans. Besides, the fact that animals have almost the same biological structure as humans especially mammals. However, these reasons should not justify their actions is acceptable to use animals in the experimental setting. For these, I have two reasons why do we should not use the animal in experiments. Firstly, we should protect our ecosystem. Though this is claimed by the researchers who need and regard it as something unavoidable. However, the animal is also a living that needs to coexist in our biosystem, they act as a food chain in our ecosystem. Therefore, using them as an experimental tool will result in an imbalance in the ecosystem. If any of them extinct, the others will follow is what stated by the animal’s activist. If this situation is prolonged in the end human will also extinct. Secondly, with the development of new technologies on cell and computerized humans, animal testing can be avoidable or terminate completely. Researcher and technologies should change their researching direction and focus on these new technologies. The fact that these new technologies are far more effective and practical compared to the use of animals is undeniable. For example, if one rat died in an experiment, we have to replace it with another rat, and thus start from the beginning because one rat might have different tolerance compared to the first which is very time-consuming. But using computerized humans, everything can set according to the available data. In conclusion, animals and humans coexist as a food chain to one and another. The loss of one of them will result in an imbalance of our ecosystem. In the future with the development of new technologies and researches, I believe we can conduct an experiment that can be clinically proven without using the animal. Thus, we can create a safer environment for both animals and humans.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
said that the usage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experimental
setting is undeniable more effective compared to the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of non-living things.
However
, this view is disregarding the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
value as the same living things as humans.

I
personally
strongly
disagree with using the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experimental
setting. Though
undoubtedly
that there several reasons why
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
researchers
choose to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experimental
testing. They claimed that for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
medicine to
be approved
clinically
it is unavoidable to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
.
“As” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
As
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
researchers
need to prioritize the safety of the medicine to be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
.
Besides
, the fact that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
have almost the same biological structure as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
especially
mammals.
However
, these reasons should not justify their actions is acceptable to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experimental
setting. For these, I have two reasons why do we should not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
in experiments.

Firstly
, we should protect our ecosystem. Though this
is claimed
by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
researchers
who need and regard it as something unavoidable.
However
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
is
also
a living that needs to coexist in our
Possible spelling mistake found.
biosystem
, they act as a food chain in our ecosystem.
Therefore
, using them as an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
experimental
tool will result in an imbalance in the ecosystem. If any of them extinct, the others will follow is what stated by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal’s
activist.
“If” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
If
this situation
is prolonged
in the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
will
also
extinct.

Secondly
, with the development of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technologies
on cell and computerized
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
testing can be avoidable or terminate completely.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Researcher
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technologies
should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
their researching direction and focus on these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technologies
. The fact that these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technologies
are far more effective and practical compared to the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
is undeniable.
For example
, if one rat
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
died
in an experiment, we
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
replace it with another rat, and
thus
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
from the beginning
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
one rat might have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
tolerance compared to the
first
which is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
time-consuming.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
using computerized
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
, everything can set according to the available data.

In conclusion
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
coexist as a food chain to one and another. The loss of one of them will result in an imbalance of our ecosystem. In the future with the development of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
technologies
and researches, I believe we can conduct an experiment that can be
clinically
proven without using the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
.
Thus
, we can create a safer environment for both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Nowadays, animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of various products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
404 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts