Today it is frequently discussed that the mankind should terminate animal experiments, due to people do not have moral rights to harm insecure creatures, while others are grateful for this. This essay is going to discuss both of views and why would argue for animals testing.
On the one hand, creatures have rights to live calmly without suffering. Testing are cause corporal pain, harm and sometimes death of animals. Even if scientist could find another alternative as computer simulation to test new medicine or household products, it might not provide appropriate results, due to computers are artificial items. Therefore computer simulations testing could not substitute animals.
In the contrary, people should continue animal experiments to test new drugs, cosmetics and household products. These would apply more advantages, than drawbacks. For example, if people had not experienced creatures’ tests, there would not have been vaccine, then mankind could not protect itself from hazardous disease such as polio, smallpox, tetanus and others. Therefore, only thanks to animals experiments, humanity can event an array of various medicines, because they are alive as people so they have similar symptoms and effects after applying new drugs. It is better testing beasts rather than people, how it was during the Second World War, when nazy army tested people.
This essay have debated about why animals experiments should be proceed for developing medicine, which may lead to providing healthier life for whole humankind. It also discussed other side of this argument. To conclude, I do believe that animals testing obtain more benefits for humankind’s health than if people finish these testing.
Today
it is
frequently
discussed that the mankind should terminate
animal
experiments
, due to
people
do not have moral rights to harm insecure creatures, while others are grateful for this. This essay is going to discuss both of views and why would argue for
animals
testing.
On the one hand, creatures have rights to
live
calmly
without suffering.
Testing
are cause corporal pain, harm and
sometimes
death of
animals
. Even if scientist could find another alternative as computer simulation to
test
new medicine or household products, it might not provide appropriate results, due to computers are artificial items.
Therefore
computer simulations
testing
could not substitute animals.
In the contrary,
people
should continue
animal
experiments
to
test
new drugs, cosmetics and household products. These would apply more advantages, than drawbacks.
For example
, if
people
had not experienced creatures’
tests
, there would not have been vaccine, then mankind could not protect itself from hazardous disease such as polio, smallpox, tetanus
and others
.
Therefore
,
only
thanks to
animals
experiments
, humanity can
event
an array of various medicines,
because
they are alive as
people
so
they have similar symptoms and effects after applying new drugs. It is better
testing
beasts
rather
than
people
, how it was during the Second World War, when
nazy
army
tested
people
.
This essay have
debated about why
animals
experiments
should be
proceed
for developing medicine, which may lead to providing healthier life for whole humankind. It
also
discussed other side of this argument.
To conclude
, I do believe that
animals
testing
obtain more benefits for humankind’s health than if
people
finish these
testing
.