Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? No books should ever be banned. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No books should ever be banned. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 7379n
Although technological advances, books are considered the main source of information. However, many individuals suggest that books should not be banned whatever they contain. In my opinion, I suggest that books must be carefully revised, and if they contain any un moral or deviated material must be banned immediately. My opinion is based on concrete evidence on which to draw, connected to its impact on society and individuals.
Firstly, according to un moral behaviors that spread, there are a lot of books containing a lot of deviated information or material like sexual images. Due to the fact that many books are aimed at children who are not able to make a right judge for what they reading adversely affects their behavior. Due t the fact, that children make their countries' future, unrevised books may cause fail the whole country. For example, when I was a child, I used to read a lot of stories at school's library especially at the summer vacation, I read a book talking about the relation between people and god, this book contain a lot of incorrect information, I trust in books, consequently, it produces a mistaken belief, when I talked to my teacher about these beliefs and inform him the information source, he immediately convey this information to school manager who makes a ccomity to inform the ministry about this book, finally, this book has been banned due to its negative effect on our beliefs.
secondly, many books may contain unoriginal information, that many authors are inclined to rephrase some information and consider it as their contributions. This un moral behavior is considered a type of stolling and their authors must take to prisons in addition to that, their books must be banned. For example, two years ago, I submit two research papers to fulfill my master's requirement, about a month ago I discovered that someone used my results to publish a scientific paper in the same field by rephrasing the sentence on my paper in order to pass on the plagiarism check. Consequently, I mail the publisher including in it the sources of my result and how the fak author used it to cheat them. As a result, the fake author has been banned for three years.
In conclusion, due to the fact that books have a significant impact on society and individuals, its material must be carefully revised to ensure it's appropriate and originality contained. If any book failed to pass these restricted requirements, it must be banned. In addition to that, its publisher must be punished.
Although technological advances,
books
are considered
the main source of
information
.
However
,
many
individuals suggest that
books
should not be
banned
whatever they
contain
. In my opinion, I suggest that
books
must
be
carefully
revised, and if they
contain
any
un
moral or deviated material
must
be
banned
immediately. My opinion
is based
on concrete evidence on which to draw, connected to its impact on society and individuals.
Firstly
, according to
un
moral behaviors that spread, there are a
lot
of
books
containing a
lot
of deviated
information
or material like sexual images.
Due
to the fact that
many
books
are aimed
at children who are not able to
make
a right judge for what
they reading
adversely
affects their behavior.
Due
t the fact, that children
make
their countries' future,
unrevised
books
may cause fail the whole country.
For example
, when I was a child, I
used
to read a
lot
of stories at school's library
especially
at the summer vacation, I read a
book
talking about the relation between
people
and god, this
book
contain
a
lot
of incorrect
information
, I trust in
books
,
consequently
, it produces a mistaken belief, when I talked to my teacher about these beliefs and inform him the
information
source, he immediately
convey
this
information
to school manager who
makes
a
ccomity
to inform the ministry about this
book
,
finally
, this
book
has been
banned
due
to its
negative
effect on our beliefs.
secondly
,
many
books
may
contain
unoriginal
information
, that
many
authors
are inclined
to rephrase
some
information
and consider it as their contributions. This
un
moral behavior
is considered
a type of
stolling
and their
authors
must
take to prisons
in addition
to that, their
books
must
be
banned
.
For example
, two years ago, I submit two research papers to fulfill my master's requirement, about a month ago I discovered that someone
used
my results to publish a scientific paper in the same field by rephrasing the sentence on my paper in order to pass on the plagiarism
check
.
Consequently
, I mail the publisher including in it the sources of my result and how the
fak
author
used
it to cheat them.
As a result
, the fake
author
has been
banned
for three years.
In conclusion
,
due
to the fact that
books
have a significant impact on society and individuals, its material
must
be
carefully
revised to ensure it's appropriate and originality contained. If any
book
failed to pass these restricted requirements, it
must
be
banned
.
In addition
to that, its publisher
must
be punished
.