The newsletter concludes that by participating in mandatory unpaid community service students will gain working experience and also help local charities in the process. This argument is flawed for these three reasons.
Firstly, the author assumes, without evidence, that students would gain real- world working experience from volunteering. Perhaps, students choose to complete their community service in a field completely unrelated to their major. It is also possible that the local charity selected will not have the resources to provide valuable work experience that will help the student and therefore it might not have the desired impact that the school expects it to have on the student. If any of the above proves to be true the author's argument is weakened.
Secondly, it is presumed by the author that the students will become well-rounded as a result of this community service requirement. It is possible that the students' academic life may suffer as a result of the additional 8 hours of unpaid community service which may ultimately make them less well-rounded. The strength of the argument is dramatically weakened if the author does not address this assumption.
Finally, the author fallaciously assumes that the students will utilize the list of approved local charities provided. Perhaps, the students will choose to volunteer at a charity that was not listed which may result in the local charities not receiving the help they need. The argument will not hold water if the students are not volunteering at these local charities therefore the author needs to conduct a scientific survey to see if this is being done.
In conclusion, the current state of the argument is specious at best therefore the author would need to address these assumptions stated above in order to increase the validity of argument.
The newsletter concludes that by participating in mandatory unpaid
community
service
students
will gain working experience and
also
help
local
charities
in the process. This
argument
is flawed
for these three reasons.
Firstly
, the
author
assumes, without evidence, that
students
would gain real- world working experience from volunteering. Perhaps,
students
choose to complete their
community
service
in a field completely unrelated to their major. It is
also
possible that the
local
charity
selected will not have the resources to provide valuable work experience that will
help
the
student
and
therefore
it might not have the desired impact that the school
expects
it to have on the
student
.
If
any of the above proves to be true the author's
argument
is weakened
.
Secondly
, it
is presumed
by the
author
that the
students
will become well-rounded
as a result
of this
community
service
requirement. It is possible that the students' academic life may suffer
as a result
of the additional 8 hours of unpaid
community
service
which may
ultimately
make
them less well-rounded. The strength of the
argument
is
dramatically
weakened if the
author
does not address this assumption.
Finally
, the
author
fallaciously
assumes that the
students
will utilize the list of approved
local
charities
provided. Perhaps, the
students
will choose to volunteer at a
charity
that was not listed which may result in the
local
charities
not receiving the
help
they need. The
argument
will not hold water if the
students
are not volunteering at these
local
charities
therefore
the
author
needs to conduct a scientific survey to
see
if this is
being done
.
In conclusion
, the
current
state of the
argument
is specious at best
therefore
the
author
would need to address these assumptions stated above in order to increase the validity of
argument
.