Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

ndividuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? You should write at least 254 words.

ndividuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. DkoA
There had been a heated debated about whether the individuals could not have enough power to deal with some environmental problems. In constract, this pressing problem just could be solve by only the authorities or big companies. Personally, I am partly agree with this statement. This essay will discuss my both points of views and demonstrate my argument. On the one hand, each person of us certainly could not have enough expense to launch a huge campaign or some projects to enhance our environment. For example, to protect the air in our planet which we should need a lot of special tools as well as some forces to plant a huge number of trees. In addition, the individuals could not encourage another people to improve the environment due to the fact that the lack of power. That mean, we are too small to attract the attention of an entire community to help protect the environment. Therefore, only the government or large companies have the extra money and the right to solve this problem. On the other hand, it could not deny that if the big companies want to improve the environment, they really need some helps from the individuals around them. More especially, they could distribute sufficient funds to begin a project but it will not be successful without the contribution of all. For instance, the government establish a campaign such as no plastic day and they need their residents to perform it. In a nutshell, some people believe that no one can improve the environment except the government and some big companies. However, I lean on that each person have their own duty with our habitat.
There had been a heated debated about whether the individuals could not have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
power to deal with
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
environmental problems. In
Possible spelling mistake found.
constract
, this pressing problem
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
could be
Consider using the past participle "solved"?
solve
by
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
the authorities or
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
.
Personally
, I am partly
Consider using a past participle here: "agreed".
agree
with this statement. This essay will discuss my both points of views and demonstrate my argument.

On the one hand, each person of us
certainly
could not have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
expense to launch a huge campaign or
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
projects to enhance our
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
.
For example
, to protect the air in our planet which we should need
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
special tools
as well
as
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
forces to plant a huge number of trees.
In addition
, the individuals could not encourage another
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improve
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
due to the fact that the lack of power. That mean, we are too
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
to attract the attention of an entire community to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
protect the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
.
Therefore
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
or large
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
have the extra money and the right to solve this problem.

On the other hand
, it could not deny that if the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
want to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improve
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
, they
really
need
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helps
from
Consider using "the surrounding individuals".
the individuals around them
. More
especially
, they could distribute sufficient funds to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
a project
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
it will not be successful without the contribution of all.
For instance
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
establish a campaign such as no plastic
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
day and
they need their residents to perform it.

In a nutshell,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
believe that no one can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improve
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
except the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
.
However
, I lean on that each person have their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
duty with our habitat.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay ndividuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
277 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts