It is believed that the best way to solve traffic issues is by giving high rate tax for private motor vehicle owners, and the fund could be allocated for improving public transportation systems and facilities. The solution has its own positive and negative sides and the following essay will discuss them in details.
For a number of reasons, charging personal car owners with high tax rate with high tax rate and allocate the fund for improving and developing public transportation brings a lot of benefits for the society. It is undeniable that with the high tax rate, the number of car owners will gradually decrease and traffic congestion problem would slowly decline. As a result, people could commute faster work more effective and efficient and air pollution would be reduced.
Besides that, the collected tax fund could be used to improve and manage public transportation, as a lot of people would change their mode of transportation from personal cars into public transportation. For example, the government could replace all the old subway trains and buses with the new ones which consume fuel efficiently and more comfortable for passengers. Consequently, the budget for public transportation fuel could be reduced and public transportation user would feel comfort in using the facilities.
On the other hand, taxing private car owners heavily have some negative sides for the individual and the society. Firstly, many people live in areas which are not covered by public transportation, such as those who lived in rural areas or countryside. Should there be any public buses or trains that pass through that areas, the schedule might be only once or twice in a day. These people need private cars and if the tax for motorised vehicles is raised significantly then it would be a big burden and problem for them. Secondly, it is a fact that automotive industries have absorbed so many employments. As the demand for motor vehicle decreases due to the high tax rate, many automobile companies would reduce their employment number. As a consequence, the country's unemployment rate would be high.
In conclusion, the solution of charging private car owner with high vehicle tax rate to reduce traffic problems has its own benefits and drawbacks. The advantages of the solution are that people could travel faster and air pollution would be reduced. However, the disadvantages of it are that it would become a big problem for those who lived in remote areas since public transports are rarely reaching them and also cause unemployment issue.
It
is believed
that the best way to solve traffic issues is by giving
high
rate
tax
for
private
motor
vehicle
owners
, and the fund could
be allocated
for improving
public
transportation
systems and facilities. The solution has its
own
positive
and
negative
sides and the following essay will discuss them in
details
.
For a number of reasons, charging personal
car
owners
with
high
tax
rate
with
high
tax
rate
and allocate the fund for improving and developing
public
transportation
brings
a lot of
benefits for the society. It is undeniable that with the
high
tax
rate
, the number of
car
owners
will
gradually
decrease and traffic congestion
problem
would
slowly
decline.
As a result
,
people
could commute faster work more effective and efficient and air pollution would be
reduced
.
Besides
that, the collected
tax
fund could be
used
to
improve
and manage
public
transportation
, as
a lot of
people
would
change
their mode of
transportation
from personal
cars
into
public
transportation
.
For example
, the
government
could replace all the
old
subway trains and buses with the new ones which consume fuel
efficiently
and more comfortable for passengers.
Consequently
, the budget for
public
transportation
fuel could be
reduced
and
public
transportation
user would feel comfort in using the facilities.
On the other hand
, taxing
private
car
owners
heavily
have
some
negative
sides for the individual and the society.
Firstly
,
many
people
live
in
areas
which are not covered by
public
transportation
, such as those who
lived
in rural
areas
or countryside. Should there be any
public
buses or trains that pass through that
areas
, the schedule might be
only
once or twice in a day. These
people
need
private
cars
and if the
tax
for
motorised
vehicles
is raised
significantly
then it would be a
big
burden and
problem
for them.
Secondly
, it is a fact that automotive industries have absorbed
so
many
employments. As the demand for motor
vehicle
decreases due to the
high
tax
rate
,
many
automobile
companies
would
reduce
their employment number. As a consequence, the country's unemployment
rate
would be high.
In conclusion
, the solution of charging
private
car
owner
with
high
vehicle
tax
rate
to
reduce
traffic
problems
has its
own
benefits and drawbacks. The advantages of the solution are that
people
could travel faster and air pollution would be
reduced
.
However
, the disadvantages of it are that it would become a
big
problem
for those who
lived
in remote
areas
since
public
transports are rarely reaching them and
also
cause unemployment issue.