Exercise is one of the programs that has been included in the curriculum by most schools. There is a constant debate about whether physical activities are required or not. I would like to address both views prior to concluding either of them.
To start with, on one side of the coin, many argue that physical education is an essential program that ought to be encouraged and taught to students. Firstly, this helps in maintaining the mental and physical health of a child which in turn keeps a child energetic, fit and resistant to various diseases. To illustrate, kids who play outdoors, such as in grass and sand develop a better immune system than kids who stay indoors and in sterile conditions. Secondly, it helps in decreasing the risk of health conditions such as diabetes and obesity. Furthermore, a recent study has revealed that indulgence in these activities do not let students sneak time for electronic gadgets. Lastly, physical programs are crucial in inculcating values such as team spirit, co-existence and cooperation. Therefore, the array of benefits makes it an inevitable part of the school’s curriculum.
On the flip side of the coin, there are people who are against those programs being a part of a student’s education. To begin with, exercise for long might tire children and also affect academics. Also, students who have disabilities might not be a part of this program. These impairments might lower the morale of a child and make them physically and mentally inactive. Instead, if programs such as soft skills, computer numeracy and arts being a part of the curriculum can be helpful. Hence these are a few cons of this program.
To sum up, the pros of physical education ought to be mandatory for students who are capable, as this nourishes the growth of children. In light of the cons, students with impairments should be kept in mind and be provided with an alternative program.
Exercise is one of the
programs
that has
been included
in the curriculum by most schools. There is a constant debate about whether
physical
activities
are required
or not. I would like to address both views prior to concluding either of them.
To
start
with, on one side of the coin,
many
argue that
physical
education is an essential
program
that ought to
be encouraged
and taught to
students
.
Firstly
, this
helps
in maintaining the mental and
physical
health of a child which in turn
keeps
a child energetic, fit and resistant to various diseases. To illustrate, kids
who
play outdoors, such as in grass and sand develop a better immune system than kids
who
stay indoors and in sterile conditions.
Secondly
, it
helps
in decreasing the
risk
of health conditions such as diabetes and obesity.
Furthermore
, a recent study has revealed that indulgence in these activities do not
let
students
sneak time for electronic gadgets.
Lastly
,
physical
programs
are crucial in inculcating values such as team spirit, co-existence and cooperation.
Therefore
, the array of benefits
makes
it an inevitable
part
of the school’s curriculum.
On the flip side of the coin, there are
people
who
are against those
programs
being a
part
of a
student’s
education. To
begin
with, exercise for long might tire children and
also
affect academics.
Also
,
students
who
have disabilities might not be a
part
of this
program
. These impairments might lower the morale of a child and
make
them
physically
and mentally inactive.
Instead
, if
programs
such as soft
skills
, computer numeracy and arts being a
part
of the curriculum can be helpful.
Hence
these are a few cons of this program.
To sum up, the pros of
physical
education ought to be mandatory for
students
who
are capable, as this nourishes the growth of children. In light of the cons,
students
with impairments should be
kept
in mind and
be provided
with an alternative
program
.