Some people believe that artists do not earn a decent salary and hence they should receive some financial help from the government so that it is easier for them to continue with their jobs. I disagree with this statement because artists nowadays receive help from many non-profit organisations and also because technology has made it easier for them to get recognised globally.
Creative people these days receive a lot of help from companies which believe in preserving art and nature. These organisations provide financial help to any person who has genuine talent in the field of art. They even provide career opportunities to them and market their work and ideas across the world. For example, the Global Art organisation in the UK provides a medium to help people who are interested in creating new art and preserving the existing one for the society. Consequently, there is no need for the government to fund them separately.
Artists have also started receiving global recognition due to the advent of technology. The use of various visual media and advanced creative software has made it easier for them to create better design and sell them internationally. Since the financial dealing is done with people from across the world these artists can earn in international currency directly from their homes. These days, people’s love for abstract paintings and sculptures are on the rise and they can be sold to anyone by simply video conferencing with the customer anywhere. Therefore, as artists are earning in different currencies it is not necessary for the government to fund them anymore. To conclude, there is no need for the government to support the artists financially any longer because there are many art loving organisations that willingly support them. At the same time, due to worldwide marketing they have started being recognized by many people and hence it is easier for them to sell their work. 
 Some
  people
 believe that  
artists
 do not earn a decent salary and  
hence
 they should receive  
some
 financial  
help
 from the  
government
  so
 that it is  
easier
 for them to continue with their jobs. I disagree with this statement  
because
  artists
 nowadays receive  
help
 from  
many
 non-profit  
organisations
 and  
also
  because
 technology has made it  
easier
 for them to  
get
  recognised
 globally.
Creative  
people
 these days receive  
a lot of
  help
 from  
companies
 which believe in preserving  
art
 and nature. These  
organisations
 provide financial  
help
 to any person who has genuine talent in the field of  
art
. They even provide career opportunities to them and market their work and  
ideas
 across the world.  
For example
, the Global  
Art
  organisation
 in the UK provides a medium to  
help
  people
 who  
are interested
 in creating new  
art
 and preserving the existing one for the society.  
Consequently
, there is no need for the  
government
 to fund them  
separately
.
Artists have  
also
  started
 receiving global recognition due to the advent of technology. The  
use
 of various visual media and advanced creative software has made it  
easier
 for them to create better design and sell them  
internationally
. Since the financial dealing  
is done
 with  
people
 from across the world these  
artists
 can earn in international currency  
directly
 from their homes. These days,  
people’s
  love
 for abstract paintings and sculptures are on the  
rise and
 they can  
be sold
 to anyone by  
simply
 video conferencing with the customer anywhere.  
Therefore
, as  
artists
 are earning in  
different
 currencies it is not necessary for the  
government
 to fund them anymore.  
To conclude
, there is no need for the  
government
 to support the  
artists
  financially
 any longer  
because
 there are  
many
  art
 loving  
organisations
 that  
willingly
 support them. At the same time, due to worldwide marketing they have  
started
 being  
recognized
 by  
many
  people
 and  
hence
 it is  
easier
 for them to sell their work.