Modern world has no real picture from Austen' time.Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific arguments made in the reading passage.

In this set of materials, the writer and lecturer are discussing the reality of Jane Austen 's portrait. They are largely discordant with each other while the writer claims some experts have good reasons to believe. They poses several reasons about debate. The lecturer invalidates the writer's assertions in all aspects and demonstrates that it is not real Austen's seen. The detail of the professor's refutations are revealed in the following paragraphs. People know Jane Austen from Hollywood movies or a portrait which does not resemble properly. In the Austen times, people have no any technological devices, so it is found ony paintings. Lecturer says first portrait was publicated in 1882 but it is an illustrate Austen's whom dead before 70 years ago. Portrait has some drawbacks that is related with Cassandra's sketch. It has some similarity with her cousins, some teenager girls. This has no objective painting. İt looks like painter thinks about Austen. Austen portrait has no real dated that is not exact. There is an debate among the people. But lecturer attributes a stamp which is find the picture. İt is dated nearly time. According to it, painter is 27 years old when the portrait has finished. There is not coherent between the painter old and Austen. Moreover, painter does not live in London that is real evidence.