In this set of materials, the writer and the lecturer are discussing the influences of American Elections at 1812. They are largely discordant with each other while the writer offers that president Clay has heroic figure in American History other claims that he is known many of drawbacks which he did during presidential mission. There are found some reasons; he enforced laws, pressures the congress to pass acts and leads to kill hundreds of indians people. The lecturer invalidates the writer’s assertions in all aspects and demonstrates that president Clay is not known heroic person in the American History that he has negative aspects. The details of the professor’s refutation are explained in the following paragraphs respectively.
Firstly, President Clay used laws subjective aim which includes serious results. For instance, his friend was elected by clay that is moral risk to the community. To pass The Chief Executive law, he enforce to congress. He used constitutional laws for own benefits, although he is a fame president and general in the past times. He has strengthened power via laws and not give an equal executive.
Secondly, he is known with bad fame among The American Indians, because American forces kill hundreds of Creek Indians in the battle. Moreover, he forced to removal Cherooke Indians from their land, cause of natural sources. This behaviour oppose the real human acts that in our time. In the Clay time, big part of the community believe in Clay whatever he want to do it. So, he get to force over Indian tribes that are known peaceful people. But, sources more important than humanity for Clay.
To sum up, books include different story about Clays, he has known a historical figure American History. The boos portrayed powerful, respectful and hero, these are common features. Especially, lecturer point out Clay’s need to limitless power and responsibility face to laws in order to use own benefits.
In this set of materials, the writer and the lecturer are discussing the influences of American Elections at 1812. They are
largely
discordant with each other while the writer offers that president
Clay
has heroic figure in American History other claims that he is
known
many
of drawbacks which he did during presidential mission. There
are found
some
reasons; he enforced
laws
, pressures the congress to pass acts and leads to kill hundreds of
indians
people
. The lecturer invalidates the writer’s assertions in all aspects and demonstrates that president
Clay
is not
known
heroic person in the American History that he has
negative
aspects. The
details
of the professor’s refutation are
explained
in the following paragraphs
respectively
.
Firstly
, President
Clay
used
laws
subjective aim which includes serious results.
For instance
, his friend
was elected
by
clay
that is
moral
risk
to the community. To pass The Chief Executive
law
, he
enforce
to congress. He
used
constitutional
laws
for
own
benefits, although he is a fame president and general in the past times. He has strengthened power via
laws
and not give an equal executive.
Secondly
, he is
known
with
bad
fame among The American Indians,
because
American forces kill hundreds of Creek Indians in the battle.
Moreover
, he forced to removal
Cherooke
Indians from their land, cause of natural sources.
This behaviour oppose
the real human acts that in our time. In the
Clay
time,
big
part of the community believe in
Clay
whatever he
want
to do it.
So
, he
get
to force over Indian tribes that are
known
peaceful
people
.
But
, sources more
important
than humanity for Clay.
To sum up, books include
different
story about
Clays
, he has
known
a historical figure American History. The boos portrayed powerful, respectful and hero, these are common features.
Especially
, lecturer point out
Clay’s
need to limitless power and responsibility face to
laws
in order to
use
own
benefits.