It is advised by individuals to impose a single punishment for each and every crime. It's pros are of a decent concern, regardless it's cons must not be overlooked.
It is ideal that if sole punishment is put into order for all the criminal activities the judiciary sector may feel a lot of stress vapoured into thin air, since they would have to give exactly identical charges to every criminal. Firstly, it would save a lot of valuable time during prosecution hence enabling the rapid conclusion of the defaulter. Moreover, a person before infringing rules will think twice as he will already know the consequences. A perfect example for this is Dubai, where such activities have been put down to a mere 5% since the past decade and is rapidly depleting even more.
On the other hand, some are not born offenders and sometimes get influenced by pessimistic groups and end up committing small crimes such as pick pocketting, domestic violence, etc. and still face criminal charges similar to that of a murder convict which would be rather unfair because he might learn his lesson by only spending a couple days in the lockup. Therefore, the punishment must be judged on the harshness of crime and both social and financial background of the person.
In conclusion, even though an universal punishment may be more efficient and provide better safety it might have unfair consequences on criminals who have been forced to such tasks without taking their personal will in regard.
It
is advised
by individuals to impose a single
punishment
for each and every crime. It's pros are of a decent concern, regardless it's cons
must
not
be overlooked
.
It
is ideal that if sole
punishment
is put
into order for all the
criminal
activities the judiciary sector may feel
a lot of
stress
vapoured
into thin air, since they would
have to
give exactly identical charges to every
criminal
.
Firstly
, it would save
a lot of
valuable time during prosecution
hence
enabling the rapid conclusion of the defaulter.
Moreover
, a person
before
infringing
rules
will
think
twice as he will already know the consequences. A perfect example for this is Dubai, where such activities have
been put
down to a mere 5% since the past decade and is
rapidly
depleting even more.
On the other hand
,
some
are not born offenders and
sometimes
get
influenced by pessimistic groups and
end
up committing
small
crimes such as pick
pocketting
, domestic violence, etc. and
still
face
criminal
charges similar to that of a murder convict which would be
rather
unfair
because
he might learn his lesson by
only
spending a
couple
days in the lockup.
Therefore
, the
punishment
must
be judged
on the harshness of crime and both social and financial background of the person.
In conclusion
,
even though
an
universal
punishment
may be more efficient and provide better safety it might have unfair consequences on
criminals
who have
been forced
to such tasks without taking their personal will in regard.