Tertiary education is essential for achieving success in life. Students, who get high band scores, usually get a chance to admit in universities, though older students and having a low-mark in school life should also be gotten excess into the higher education. From my perspective, all types of students both youngest with high-mark and adult students with low-grade must have a right to earn knowledge from universities.
On the one hand, pupils who earn standard marks in all his academic life, easily get admission at university. The reason is that professors at tertiaries think that since the student has achieved the highest position at school, he must have worked hard. Eventually, he will do a better result in higher studies, and cope with the workload and activities-related universities and its teachers. For example, in school, the top-rated students are disciplined and efficient so that they do their tasks efficiently and listen what their teachers are focusing on. Therefore, the dean of tertiary education selects those brilliant students who could do excellent results. Consequently, this selection generates a higher level of citizens, and socioeconomic will be strong for these intellectuals.
On the other hand, each student has the right to study at the university level. It is justifiable to say that if all students get a higher education, any nation will develop immediately. For that reason, universities should give chance to age-students as well as pupils who obtain the lowest marks at school due to the advancement of a country. For instance, in the USA, the renowned universities such as Harvard or Yale - provide their admission form for all types of students, but they should have a quality which could be anything whether skilled at sports, art or higher marks gained in the school certificate. As a result, no one is unemployed when university graduates get their certificate from tertiary education.
In conclusion, it is a controversial issue about whether universities should focus on selecting the top-rated students from intermediate level, or, whether they should select senior learners who did not cut a good figure on the previous exam. In my opinion, both types of students must be selected by the university for the socioeconomic growth of society. 
Tertiary  
education
 is essential for achieving success in life.  
Students
,  
who
  get
 high band scores,  
usually
  get
 a chance to admit in  
universities
, though older  
students
 and having a low-mark in  
school
 life should  
also
  be gotten
 excess into the higher  
education
. From my perspective, all types of  
students
 both youngest with high-mark and adult  
students
 with low-grade  
must
 have a right to earn knowledge from universities.
On the one hand, pupils  
who
 earn standard marks in all his academic life,  
easily
  get
 admission at  
university
. The reason is that professors at  
tertiaries
  think
 that since the  
student
 has achieved the highest position at  
school
, he  
must
 have worked  
hard
.  
Eventually
, he will do a better result in higher studies, and cope with the workload and activities-related  
universities
 and its teachers.  
For example
, in  
school
, the top-rated  
students
  are disciplined
 and efficient  
so
 that they do their tasks  
efficiently
 and listen what their teachers are focusing on.  
Therefore
, the dean of tertiary  
education
 selects those brilliant  
students
  who
 could do excellent results.  
Consequently
, this selection generates a higher level of citizens, and socioeconomic will be strong for these intellectuals. 
On the other hand
, each  
student
 has the right to study at the  
university
 level. It is justifiable to say that if all  
students
  get
 a higher  
education
, any nation will develop immediately. For that reason,  
universities
 should give chance to age-students  
as well
 as pupils  
who
 obtain the lowest marks at  
school
 due to the advancement of a country.  
For instance
, in the USA, the renowned  
universities
 such as Harvard or Yale  
-
 provide their admission form for all types of  
students
,  
but
 they should have a quality which could be anything whether skilled at sports, art or higher marks gained in the  
school
 certificate.  
As a result
, no one  
is unemployed
 when  
university
 graduates  
get
 their certificate from tertiary education. 
In conclusion
, it is a controversial issue about whether  
universities
 should focus on selecting the top-rated  
students
 from intermediate level, or, whether they should select senior learners  
who
 did not  
cut
 a  
good
 figure on the previous exam. In my opinion, both types of  
students
  must
  be selected
 by the  
university
 for the socioeconomic growth of society.