Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

many people feel it is waste money to try to save animal species, for example the tiger or the blue whale. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

many people feel it is waste money to try to save animal species, for example the tiger or the blue whale. with this statement? 2Pnpb
Some people said that instead of a large amount of money for the protection of animals, people should wisely spend financial funds on a number of useful purposes. I completely disagree with the idea and suppose that animal species deserve to be protected. Humans have the obligations and responsibility to conserve the diversity of wildlife. In order to obtain the development and achievement of modern life, people have exploited a massive number of natural resources comprising animals as the primary source of food and experiment objectives, consequently, human activities are the main reasons triggering the loss of plenty species. In addition, each animal has their own role contributing to the balance of habitat on the planet, the next generation will confront a severe issue by virtue of the extinction of animals. For instance, in China, because of the reduction of agricultural produce caused by some types of birds, the farmers did not allow these birds on their fields, but the worse arises by the accelerating in the population of harmful insects. Furthermore, people will gain several benefits, if they retain the wide range of animals inhabiting the earth. The behaviors and characteristics of wildlife animals are the best samples for scientists to research about nature which people have to find out to ensure the progression in the future. Moreover, the patterns of the variation of the animal population can be seen as the potential reference materials to control the human population. Some animals such as tigers and blue whales have been attracted the attention of people, their appearances of them in zoos, museums bring significant educational value, especially for the youngster. In conclusion, I completely disagree with the idea assume that we should overlook the vital role of every animal on the planet.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
said that
instead
of a large amount of money for the protection of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
should
wisely
spend financial funds on a number of useful purposes. I completely disagree with the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
and suppose that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
species deserve to
be protected
.

Humans have the obligations and responsibility to conserve the diversity of wildlife. In order to obtain the development and achievement of modern life,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
have exploited a massive number of natural resources comprising
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
as the primary source of food and experiment objectives,
consequently
, human activities are the main reasons triggering the loss of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
plenty
species.
In addition
, each
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
has their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
role contributing to the balance of habitat on the planet, the
next
generation will confront a severe issue by virtue of the extinction of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
For instance
, in China,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of the reduction of agricultural produce caused by
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
types of birds, the farmers did not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
allow
these birds on their fields,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
the worse arises by the accelerating in the population of harmful insects.

Furthermore
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
will gain several benefits, if they retain the wide range of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
inhabiting the earth. The behaviors and characteristics of wildlife
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are the best samples for scientists to research about nature which
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
find out to ensure the progression in the future.
Moreover
, the patterns of the variation of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
population can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
as the potential reference materials to control the human population.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
such as tigers and blue whales have
been attracted
the attention of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
, their appearances of them in zoos, museums bring significant educational value,
especially
for the youngster.

In conclusion
, I completely disagree with the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
assume that we should overlook the vital role of every
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
on the planet.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay many people feel it is waste money to try to save animal species, for example the tiger or the blue whale. with this statement?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
293 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • many people feel it is waste money to try to save animal species, for example the tiger or the blue whale. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?