The idea of closing zoos is not one that came randomly to people. It revolves around the discussion that has animal rights at its center. I personally share the view that zoos have lost their old attraction and should be closed for two main reasons.
Firstly, it is true that such structures pose a limitation on adequate conditions of life for animals. Generally speaking, conformable zoos will try to recreate the natural habitat of each species. However, an artificial recreation of an entire ecosystem may be virtually possible but impractical. Animals such as tigers and lions, which are enclosed in portions of lands that try to imitate savannas, would still lack the possibility of adapting to real forms of natural stimulus. Creatures of this kind are natural hunters but their innate capability of providing for themselves is hindered in structures such as zoos, where food is provided by external individuals and zookeepers.
On the other hand, the decision of keeping zoos in modern cities may not account for sanitary, phytosanitary and general health conditions. According to recent studies, more than 70% of existing viruses are transmitted by wild animals as they are the perfect symbiosis subjects. If we add the increasing population densities in modern cities to the equation we could obtain a rapidly expanding pandemic in the not-so-distant future. I t should be noticed that the majority of zoos around the world are not kept under decent sanitary conditions, which may increase the likelihood of close contact and transmission of viral beings.
Alternatives to zoos are already in place. Safaris are one example of activity that allows people to experience and admire animals in their natural habitat, limiting close contact. Such forms of entertainment, however, are starting to sprawl not only in Africa, Australia, exotic and maybe not so affordable sites. Italy, for instance is one of the first countries that opened the so called “Le Cornelle”. This is a park that provides people sitting in their cars with the possibility of admiring the different species that live in the Alpes, outside of captivity.
In conclusion, the idea of keeping animals in concrete prisons, no matter how close those prisons resemble natural habitats, is an outdated one that does not conform with nowadays societal conditions. Open parks with safe conditions of distance are, on the other hand, the future and adequate alternative to zoos
The
idea
of closing zoos is not one that came
randomly
to
people
. It revolves around the discussion that has
animal
rights at its center. I
personally
share the view that zoos have lost their
old
attraction and should
be closed
for two main reasons.
Firstly
, it is true that such structures pose a limitation on adequate conditions of life for
animals
.
Generally
speaking, conformable zoos will try to recreate the
natural
habitat of each species.
However
, an artificial recreation of an entire ecosystem may be
virtually
possible
but
impractical.
Animals
such as tigers and lions, which
are enclosed
in portions of lands that try to imitate savannas, would
still
lack the possibility of adapting to real forms of
natural
stimulus. Creatures of this kind are
natural
hunters
but
their innate capability of providing for themselves
is hindered
in structures such as zoos, where food
is provided
by external individuals and zookeepers.
On the other hand
, the decision of keeping zoos in modern cities may not account for sanitary,
phytosanitary
and general health conditions. According to recent studies, more than 70% of existing viruses
are transmitted
by wild
animals
as they are the perfect symbiosis subjects.
If
we
add
the increasing population densities in modern cities to the equation we could obtain a
rapidly
expanding pandemic in the not-
so
-distant future. I t should
be noticed
that the majority of zoos around the world are not
kept
under decent sanitary conditions, which may increase the likelihood of close contact and transmission of viral beings.
Alternatives to zoos are already in place. Safaris are one example of activity that
allows
people
to experience and admire
animals
in their
natural
habitat, limiting close contact. Such forms of entertainment,
however
, are starting to sprawl not
only
in Africa, Australia, exotic and maybe not
so
affordable sites. Italy,
for instance
is one of the
first
countries that opened the
so
called “Le
Cornelle
”. This is a park that provides
people
sitting in their cars with the possibility of admiring the
different
species that
live
in the
Alpes
, outside of captivity.
In conclusion
, the
idea
of keeping
animals
in concrete prisons, no matter how close those prisons resemble
natural
habitats, is an outdated one that does not conform with nowadays societal conditions. Open parks with safe conditions of distance are,
on the other hand
, the future and adequate alternative to
zoos