Although, many people believe that using animals for experimental purpose is a wrong thing which acceptable. While other group of thinkers support that it is the basic necessity for the development of science and technology. I think in a reverse manner and disagree to the given statement. My inclination is justified in the following paragraphs.
Out of all the arguments the strongest one to prove my point is animals have their own life and we are no one to raze it down. Also, they possess so much of pain which is indescribable. However, it is not proved yet that animals are the only source to taste and approve the project. In addition, there are plethora of cases were it is humans are not taking preventing measures of their health which is damaged by them. Moreover, there are plenty of cases where creatures have lost their lives. For instance, dogs are forced to take injections which they do not agree to take. To add to this, rabbits are victimised to add corrosive chemicals in their eyes.
On the contrary, some people counter-claim the mentioned support. The foremost argument they do is developement of science. This due to save the human population by not affecting theirs lives. To exemplify this case, if we have to update any new vaccine or medicine in market first, we have to pass through so many testing and without these creatures it is hard to get approved because it is the question of humam life. Besides this, millions of life is saved by this experimental tasks.
Thus, wrap up the discussion, it can be said that despite of killing innocent silent life try to evolve science in such a way where we do not have to use this animals. Moreover, every beast in this world is created by God to make world beautiful not to make it experimental.
Although,
many
people
believe that using
animals
for experimental purpose is a
wrong
thing which acceptable. While other group of thinkers support that it is the basic necessity for the development of science and technology. I
think
in a reverse manner
and disagree to the
given
statement. My inclination
is justified
in the following paragraphs.
Out of all the arguments the strongest one to prove my point is
animals
have their
own
life and
we are no one to raze it down.
Also
, they possess
so
much of pain which is indescribable.
However
, it is not proved
yet
that
animals
are the
only
source to taste and approve the project.
In addition
, there are plethora of cases were it is humans are not taking preventing measures of their health which
is damaged
by them.
Moreover
, there are
plenty
of cases where creatures have lost their
lives
.
For instance
, dogs
are forced
to take injections which they do not
agree
to take. To
add
to this, rabbits are
victimised
to
add
corrosive chemicals in their eyes.
On the contrary
,
some
people
counter-claim the mentioned support. The foremost argument they do is
developement
of science. This due to save the human population by not affecting theirs
lives
. To exemplify this case, if we
have to
update any new vaccine or medicine in market
first
, we
have to
pass through
so
many
testing and without these creatures it is
hard
to
get
approved
because
it is the question of
humam
life
.
Besides
this, millions of
life
is saved
by this experimental tasks.
Thus
, wrap up the discussion, it can
be said
that
despite of
killing innocent silent
life
try to evolve science in such a way where we do not
have to
use
this
animals
.
Moreover
, every beast in this world
is created
by God to
make
world
beautiful
not to
make
it experimental.