Although, many people believe that using animals for experimental purpose is a wrong thing which acceptable. While other group of thinkers support that it is the basic necessity for the development of science and technology. I think in a reverse manner and disagree to the given statement. My inclination is justified in the following paragraphs.
Out of all the arguments the strongest one to prove my point is animals have their own life and we are no one to raze it down. Also, they possess so much of pain which is indescribable. However, it is not proved yet that animals are the only source to taste and approve the project. In addition, there are plethora of cases were it is humans are not taking preventing measures of their health which is damaged by them. Moreover, there are plenty of cases where creatures have lost their lives. For instance, dogs are forced to take injections which they do not agree to take. To add to this, rabbits are victimised to add corrosive chemicals in their eyes.
On the contrary, some people counter-claim the mentioned support. The foremost argument they do is developement of science. This due to save the human population by not affecting theirs lives. To exemplify this case, if we have to update any new vaccine or medicine in market first, we have to pass through so many testing and without these creatures it is hard to get approved because it is the question of humam life. Besides this, millions of life is saved by this experimental tasks.
Thus, wrap up the discussion, it can be said that despite of killing innocent silent life try to evolve science in such a way where we do not have to use this animals. Moreover, every beast in this world is created by God to make world beautiful not to make it experimental. 
Although,  
many
  people
 believe that using  
animals
 for experimental purpose is a  
wrong
 thing which acceptable. While other group of thinkers support that it is the basic necessity for the development of science and technology. I  
think
  in a reverse manner
 and disagree to the  
given
 statement. My inclination  
is justified
 in the following paragraphs.
Out of all the arguments the strongest one to prove my point is  
animals
 have their  
own
  life and
 we are no one to raze it down.  
Also
, they possess  
so
 much of pain which is indescribable.  
However
, it is not proved  
yet
 that  
animals
 are the  
only
 source to taste and approve the project.  
In addition
, there are plethora of cases were it is humans are not taking preventing measures of their health which  
is damaged
 by them.  
Moreover
, there are  
plenty
 of cases where creatures have lost their  
lives
.  
For instance
, dogs  
are forced
 to take injections which they do not  
agree
 to take. To  
add
 to this, rabbits are  
victimised
 to  
add
 corrosive chemicals in their eyes. 
On the contrary
,  
some
  people
 counter-claim the mentioned support. The foremost argument they do is  
developement
 of science. This due to save the human population by not affecting theirs  
lives
. To exemplify this case, if we  
have to
 update any new vaccine or medicine in market  
first
, we  
have to
 pass through  
so
  many
 testing and without these creatures it is  
hard
 to  
get
 approved  
because
 it is the question of  
humam
  life
.  
Besides
 this, millions of  
life
  is saved
 by this experimental tasks. 
Thus
, wrap up the discussion, it can  
be said
 that  
despite of
 killing innocent silent  
life
 try to evolve science in such a way where we do not  
have to
  use
  this
  animals
.  
Moreover
, every beast in this world  
is created
 by God to  
make
 world  
beautiful
 not to  
make
 it experimental.