In recent decades, cities, especially metropolises, have faced more pollution than ever before. As a result, a controversy has arisen over what is the primary reason behind this predicament. While some people attribute it to the marked increase in cars, others would contend that the chief among all causes is industrial activities, which from my perspective, the latter is more accurate. Although cars, undoubtedly, cause a detrimental effect on the urban environment, the catastrophe industrialism brings in its wake is much more disturbing.
Emitting harmful gases to the air, cars have always been considered a danger to cities. The gravity of this problem, nonetheless, has been alleviated thanks to significant alterations. Electric cars are going into publicity as a substitute for conventional pollutant cars. The government, furthermore, is determined to take an environmentally friendly approach by allocating more expenditure on public transportation, which culminate in a decline in the number of cars. Hence, the side effects of overusing cars are going to be marginal in the foreseeable future.
In stark contrast, never have been urban districts experienced such industrial growth in history. The modern lifestyle which consumerism plays a major role in, leads to a marked boost in the construction of factories, with the aim of providing a wide range of multi-coloured products for consumer society. Having occupied the suburbs, factories are likely to encroach into the heart of cities in the future. If it happens, cities’ degradation will occur. Unfortunately, not only does this damage ruin cities, but it also brings long-term consequences to the ecosystem in the shape of global warming and the extinction of species.
By way of conclusion, both cars and factories are culprits for cities’ pollution. The industrial issue, however, is the pivot in which the catastrophe turns.
In recent decades,
cities
,
especially
metropolises, have faced more pollution than ever
before
.
As a result
, a controversy has arisen over what is the primary reason behind this predicament. While
some
people
attribute it to the marked increase in
cars
, others would contend that the chief among all causes is industrial activities, which from my perspective, the latter is more accurate. Although
cars
,
undoubtedly
, cause a detrimental effect on the urban environment, the catastrophe industrialism brings in its wake is much more disturbing.
Emitting harmful gases to the air,
cars
have always
been considered
a
danger
to
cities
. The gravity of this problem, nonetheless, has
been alleviated
thanks to significant alterations. Electric
cars
are going into publicity as a substitute for conventional pollutant
cars
. The
government
,
furthermore
,
is determined
to take an
environmentally
friendly approach by allocating more expenditure on public transportation, which culminate in a decline in the number of
cars
.
Hence
, the side effects of overusing
cars
are going to be marginal in the foreseeable future.
In stark contrast, never have been urban districts experienced such industrial growth in history. The modern lifestyle which consumerism plays a major role in, leads to a marked boost in the construction of factories, with the aim of providing a wide range of
multi-coloured
products for consumer society. Having occupied the suburbs, factories are likely to encroach into the heart of
cities
in the future. If it happens,
cities’
degradation will occur. Unfortunately, not
only
does this damage ruin
cities
,
but
it
also
brings long-term
consequences to
the ecosystem in the shape of global warming and the extinction of species.
By way of conclusion, both
cars
and factories are culprits for
cities’
pollution. The industrial issue,
however
, is the pivot in which the catastrophe turns.