Health is a common concern for modern people. Many believe that it is more straightforward to live healthily in the countryside while others maintain that living in a metropolitan area can benefit health. A closer look at the issue will help in assessing these views.
Undoubtedly, it is much simpler to live a healthy life in non-urban areas. First, the smaller number of people means the environment is cleaner, which can positively affect people's health. Indeed, many resorts and treatment facilities are explicitly built in areas far away from large cities. Furthermore, the slower pace of living and wider open spaces in the countryside provides a lot more chances to exercise. A personal example would be the fact that it would take me an hour to drive to the nearest hiking location now that I am living near the city center, while I could go hiking a lot more frequently when I was living in the countryside last year. Thus, I would argue that having a healthy lifestyle in the countryside is easier.
Many argue that city life is beneficial for people's health. Firstly, while there are fewer natural places for exercising, the number of fitness centers more than make up for this shortcoming. In addition, living in the city also gives people easier access to health services like regular health check-ups, which can help them detect serious illness early and potentially save their lives. However, the city's pollution is detrimental to physical well-being, and the large number of people and the fast pace of life always bring stress that harms their mental health. The exercise and health services might not be able to outweigh this adverse effect. Therefore, I believe that while there are benefits, life in the city is more harmful.
In conclusion, in my view, it is indeed simpler to live a healthy life in the country. On the other hand, living in the city life does have its advantages, but the drawbacks can be more significant.
Health
is a common concern for modern
people
.
Many
believe that it is more straightforward to
live
healthily
in the
countryside
while others maintain that
living
in a metropolitan area can benefit
health
. A closer look at the issue will
help
in assessing these views.
Undoubtedly
, it is much simpler to
live
a healthy
life
in non-urban areas.
First
, the smaller number of
people
means the environment is cleaner, which can
positively
affect
people
's
health
.
Indeed
,
many
resorts and treatment facilities are
explicitly
built in areas far away from large
cities
.
Furthermore
, the slower pace of
living
and wider open spaces in the
countryside
provides a lot more chances to exercise. A personal example would be the fact that it would take me an hour to drive to the nearest hiking location
now
that I am
living
near the city center, while I could go hiking a lot more
frequently
when I was
living
in the
countryside
last year.
Thus
, I would argue that having a healthy lifestyle in the
countryside
is easier.
Many
argue that city
life
is beneficial for
people
's
health
.
Firstly
, while there are fewer natural places for exercising, the number of fitness centers more than
make
up for this shortcoming.
In addition
,
living
in the city
also
gives
people
easier access to
health
services like regular
health
check
-ups, which can
help
them detect serious illness early and
potentially
save their
lives
.
However
, the city's pollution is detrimental to physical well-being, and the large number of
people
and the
fast
pace of
life
always bring
stress
that harms their mental
health
. The exercise and
health
services might not be able to outweigh this adverse effect.
Therefore
, I believe that while there are benefits,
life
in the city is more harmful.
In conclusion
, in my view, it is
indeed
simpler to
live
a healthy
life
in the country.
On the other hand
,
living
in the city
life
does have its advantages,
but
the drawbacks can be more significant.