What is easier to pull down or to build? At present, it is argued that old buildings defended by the government should be replaced by modern constructions. Many historical objects are considered by the law to be one of the most essential determining parts of humanity’s heritage. This essay analyses the importance of keeping old walls and discussed historical influence on the breakthrough.
Exploring old buildings allowed people to discover aspects of recorded roots and consequently boost cultural knowledge. It is worth saying that all objects from the past consist of meaningful messages which defined as priceless for the whole society. This is because, firstly, such ancient constructions represent valuable assets of various nations. In the last years, renovation research has provided ample support for the assertion that numerous historical discoveries have resulted directly from research of old buildings. Another essential point of protecting such buildings is transferring our records to the next generation to make it transparent and meaningful for years.
In spite of that building modern skyscrapers have recently turned into an innovative mainstream in the majority of urban areas around the world, it does not mean that people have become more careless regarding historical centre. On the contrary, developing new objects, people constantly refer to their history, either to compare or emulate from past examples. In light of saving ancient architecture, renovating old parts of the cities is enhancing increasingly among different countries. Take for example Moscow, where a progressive way of development combines with cultural aspects and distinctively demonstrates historic periods of the country.
To conclude, although presenting new constructions always brings changes and effects on cities' exterior, a cultural heritage should remain the same and be carefully protected by the law. In other words, building new walls should not begin by destroying old ones.
What is easier to pull down or to build? At present, it
is argued
that
old
buildings
defended by the
government
should
be replaced
by modern constructions.
Many
historical
objects
are considered
by the law to be one of the most essential determining parts of humanity’s heritage. This essay analyses the importance of keeping
old
walls and discussed
historical
influence on the breakthrough.
Exploring
old
buildings
allowed
people
to discover aspects of recorded roots and
consequently
boost cultural knowledge. It is worth saying that all objects from the past consist of meaningful messages which defined as priceless for the whole society. This is
because
,
firstly
, such ancient constructions represent valuable assets of various nations. In the last years, renovation research has provided ample support for the assertion that numerous
historical
discoveries have resulted
directly
from research of
old
buildings
. Another essential point of protecting such
buildings
is transferring our records to the
next
generation to
make
it transparent and meaningful for years.
In spite of
that
building
modern skyscrapers have recently turned into an innovative mainstream in the majority of urban areas around the world, it does not mean that
people
have become more careless regarding
historical
centre
.
On the contrary
, developing new objects,
people
constantly
refer to their history, either to compare or emulate from past examples. In light of saving ancient architecture, renovating
old
parts of the cities is enhancing
increasingly
among
different
countries. Take
for example
Moscow, where a progressive way of development combines with cultural aspects and
distinctively
demonstrates historic periods of the country.
To conclude
, although presenting new constructions always brings
changes
and effects on cities' exterior, a cultural heritage should remain the same and be
carefully
protected by the law.
In other words
,
building
new walls should not
begin
by destroying
old
ones.