Numerous office authorities prohibited their employees to smoke within the office premises. Smoking is also not permitted by the government in all public places. It is an ethical idea but sadly it withdraw some of their freedom. This essay will provide my personal opinion on this topic as well as evidences of why I think this is such a good idea.
As we know, several countries especially the developed one-like Singapore-have a law that stated their country prohibits people to smoke in public facilities. If they disobey it, they have to go to the court and liable to a composition sum up to $1000. Additionally, some company requires their employees to not smoke in the building. In order to not taking away people’s freedom, active smoker can smoke in open areas like parking lot or a smoking area. Now let us imagine if this rule does not exist, the non smoker will suffer from several inconvenient such as breathing difficulties, respiratory failure, an oxygen block, etc. It can be extremely harmful especially for pregnant women, children, babies and elders to inhale smoke and become a passive smoker. Research shows that passive smokers have more respiratory issues compared to the active smokers.
Based upon the analysis above, although it is difficult for countries to banned people from smoking, I do believe that they should, because it shown more advantages than disadvantages. As long as they provide smoking areas and punish the one that disobey the law strictly, it is not taking away active smoker’s freedom but instead making non smoker have a freedom too. 
Numerous office authorities prohibited their employees to  
smoke
 within the office premises.  
Smoking
 is  
also
 not permitted by the  
government
 in all public places. It is an ethical  
idea
  but
  sadly
 it  
withdraw
  some
 of their  
freedom
. This essay will provide my personal opinion on this topic  
as well
 as evidences of why I  
think
 this is such a  
good
  idea
.
As we know, several countries  
especially
 the developed one-like Singapore-have a law that stated their country prohibits  
people
 to  
smoke
 in public facilities. If they disobey it, they  
have to
 go to the court and liable to a composition sum up to $1000.  
Additionally
,  
some
  company
 requires their employees to not  
smoke
 in the building. In order to not taking away  
people
’s  
freedom
, active smoker can  
smoke
 in open areas like parking lot or a  
smoking
 area.  
Now
  let
 us imagine if this  
rule
 does not exist, the  
non smoker
 will suffer from several inconvenient such as breathing difficulties, respiratory failure, an oxygen block, etc. It can be  
extremely
 harmful  
especially
 for pregnant women, children, babies and elders to inhale  
smoke
 and become a passive smoker. Research  
shows
 that passive smokers have more respiratory issues compared to the active smokers.
Based upon the analysis above, although it is difficult for countries to banned  
people
 from  
smoking
, I do believe that they should,  
because
 it shown more advantages than disadvantages. As long as they provide  
smoking
 areas and punish the one that disobey the law  
strictly
, it is not taking away active smoker’s  
freedom
  but
  instead
 making  
non smoker
 have a  
freedom
 too.