Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Many office authorities impose a restriction on smoking within the office premises. Some governments have even banned smoking in all public spaces. This is good idea but it takes away some of our freedom. What are your opinion on this?

Many office authorities impose a restriction on smoking within the office premises. Some governments have even banned smoking in all public spaces. This is good idea but it takes away some of our freedom. What are your opinion on this? pm33

Numerous office authorities prohibited their employees to smoke within the office premises. Smoking is also not permitted by the government in all public places. It is an ethical idea but sadly it withdraw some of their freedom. This essay will provide my personal opinion on this topic as well as evidences of why I think this is such a good idea. As we know, several countries especially the developed one-like Singapore-have a law that stated their country prohibits people to smoke in public facilities. If they disobey it, they have to go to the court and liable to a composition sum up to $1000. Additionally, some company requires their employees to not smoke in the building. In order to not taking away people’s freedom, active smoker can smoke in open areas like parking lot or a smoking area. Now let us imagine if this rule does not exist, the non smoker will suffer from several inconvenient such as breathing difficulties, respiratory failure, an oxygen block, etc. It can be extremely harmful especially for pregnant women, children, babies and elders to inhale smoke and become a passive smoker. Research shows that passive smokers have more respiratory issues compared to the active smokers. Based upon the analysis above, although it is difficult for countries to banned people from smoking, I do believe that they should, because it shown more advantages than disadvantages. As long as they provide smoking areas and punish the one that disobey the law strictly, it is not taking away active smoker’s freedom but instead making non smoker have a freedom too.

Numerous office authorities prohibited their employees to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexhaustmistgasfogsootsmog
smoke
 within the office premises. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
Smoking
 is also
 not permitted by the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 in all public places. It is an ethical This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtconceptnotion
idea
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
sadly
 it Did you mean "withdraws"?withdraws
withdraw
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 of their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrightexemptionabilitypowerflexibilityprivilege
freedom
. This essay will provide my personal opinion on this topic as well
 as evidences of why I This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 this is such a This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtconceptnotion
idea
.

As we know, several countries especially
 the developed one-like Singapore-have a law that stated their country prohibits This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexhaustmistgasfogsootsmog
smoke
 in public facilities. If they disobey it, they This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 go to the court and liable to a composition sum up to $1000. Additionally
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :enterprisecorporation
company
 requires their employees to not You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexhaustmistgasfogsootsmog
smoke
 in the building. In order to not taking away This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
’s You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrightexemptionabilitypowerflexibilityprivilege
freedom
, active smoker can You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexhaustmistgasfogsootsmog
smoke
 in open areas like parking lot or a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 area. This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :nowadays
Now
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :authorize
let
 us imagine if this This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirement
rule
 does not exist, the This expression is normally spelled as one or with hyphen.non-smokernonsmoker
non smoker
 will suffer from several inconvenient such as breathing difficulties, respiratory failure, an oxygen block, etc. It can be extremely
 harmful especially
 for pregnant women, children, babies and elders to inhale You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexhaustmistgasfogsootsmog
smoke
 and become a passive smoker. Research This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstratesportraysindicatesdisplays
shows
 that passive smokers have more respiratory issues compared to the active smokers.

Based upon the analysis above, although it is difficult for countries to banned This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 from You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
, I do believe that they should, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 it shown more advantages than disadvantages. As long as they provide You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfrenziedfanaticaldeliriouszealousenthusiasticcrazed
smoking
 areas and punish the one that disobey the law strictly
, it is not taking away active smoker’s You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrightexemptionabilitypowerflexibilityprivilege
freedom
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
instead
 making This expression is normally spelled as one or with hyphen.non-smokernonsmoker
non smoker
 have a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrightexemptionabilitypowerflexibilityprivilege
freedom
 too. 