The global population explosion has caused a myriad of problems to humans and one notable thing is that it leads to a serious housing shortage which many metropolises are confronting with. To tackle this problem, some local policy-makers assume reallocating park acreage is the best method. However, I am totally in disagreement with that suggestion due to several reasons.
Taking the repercussions of that solution into account, diminishing green areas to erect accommodation not only influences badly on humans but also on creatural development and their habitat. On the one hand, reassigning parkland is synonymous with falling trees, which causes the lack of fresh air. As a consequence, the local environment will be degraded rapidly then lead to various health troubles. Additionally, cutting down trees also means we are ruining some animals’ shelter without compassion. Not only humans but creatures also need a cover for themselves and family. On the other hand, among the hustle and bustle life these days, the local park seems to be a place for dwellers to commune with nature, unwind and recharge their battery after experiencing a long day. If parks do not subsist anymore, residents will be stranded in a formidable circle of knotty minds.
There are still some ways to solve this housing crisis without reallocating park areas. For instance, at first, local and also the national government have should propaganda the message about planned parenthood to all residents to withdraw from this trouble from the very start. Furthermore, we need to construct smaller homes instead of splendorous ones and try to take full advantage of our space in order to save acreage for other people. Lastly, social and public housing such as flats, apartment is not a bad idea to economize land area for the future generation.
To summarize, local authorities come up with the idea that reassigning green land is the appropriate solution to solve the housing shortage in this day and age. Notwithstanding, I entirely disagree with that thinking due to its negative effects on humans and other creatures. Besides, I believe that there are plenty of keys out there to deal with actuality.
The global population explosion has caused a myriad of problems to
humans
and one notable thing is that it leads to a serious housing shortage which
many
metropolises are confronting with. To tackle this problem,
some
local
policy-makers assume reallocating
park
acreage is the best method.
However
, I am
totally
in disagreement with that suggestion due to several reasons.
Taking the repercussions of that solution into account, diminishing green areas to erect accommodation not
only
influences
badly
on
humans
but
also
on
creatural
development and their habitat. On the one hand, reassigning parkland is synonymous with falling trees, which causes the lack of fresh air. As a consequence, the
local
environment will
be degraded
rapidly
then lead to various health troubles.
Additionally
, cutting down trees
also
means we are ruining
some
animals’ shelter without compassion. Not
only
humans
but
creatures
also
need a cover for themselves and family.
On the other hand
, among the hustle and bustle life these days, the
local
park
seems to be a place for dwellers to commune with nature, unwind and recharge their battery after experiencing a long day. If
parks
do not subsist anymore, residents will
be stranded
in a formidable circle of knotty minds.
There are
still
some
ways to solve this housing crisis without reallocating
park
areas.
For instance
, at
first
,
local
and
also
the national
government
have should propaganda the message about planned parenthood to all residents to withdraw from this trouble from the
very
start
.
Furthermore
, we need to construct smaller homes
instead
of splendorous ones and try to take full advantage of our space in order to save acreage for other
people
.
Lastly
, social and public housing such as flats, apartment is not a
bad
idea
to economize land area for the future generation.
To summarize
,
local
authorities
come
up with the
idea
that reassigning green land is the appropriate solution to solve the housing shortage in this day and age. Notwithstanding, I
entirely
disagree with that thinking due to its
negative
effects on
humans
and other creatures.
Besides
, I believe that there are
plenty
of keys out there to deal with actuality.