Male employees are given preference in terms of filling high power executive positions like those of CEO and CFO in a corporation; despite the fact that almost half of the working population is female. Some people assert that a fixed number of these positions should be reserved for women; however, I partially agree with the statement and the following paragraphs will substantiate my view.
To start with, gender equality is an ideology that essentially seeks to break limitations set by ancient stereotyping and to provide a society where opportunities of any genders are all equal. Men and women should have given the same chances as it avoids discrimination and creates a pleasant work environment. A quota for employing the women, if imposed will surely lead to more confident female community. Furthermore, it also bring a variety of benefits, for instance, varying the gender of the dominant class can offer companies diverse opinions and creative strategies for handling the challenges of the complicated economy.
However, having the same number of men and women on all positions is simply unrealistic. A company should be free to appoint the best candidate for each position based on their qualifications, experience and skills, in order to contribute to the success of their business. In this way, both have same opportunities, and applicants know that they will be successful only if they work hard to achieve their goals. In addition, forcing companies to fulfill certain percentages will have adverse effect not only on the morale but the productivity of employees too. The goal of the company is to maximize its productivity therefore they must choose those who are able to demonstrate great adaptability from extensive knowledge in their field.
To conclude, undeniably this practice will give women a platform to prove themselves. However, there should be other eligibility criteria in the selection process.
Male employees are
given
preference in terms of filling high power executive
positions
like those of CEO and CFO in a corporation; despite the fact that almost half of the working population is female.
Some
people
assert that a
fixed
number of these
positions
should
be reserved
for
women
;
however
, I
partially
agree
with the statement and the following paragraphs will substantiate my view.
To
start
with, gender equality is an ideology that
essentially
seeks to break limitations set by ancient stereotyping and to provide a society where opportunities of any genders are all equal.
Men
and
women
should have
given
the same chances as it avoids discrimination and creates a pleasant work environment. A quota for employing the
women
, if imposed will
surely
lead to more confident female community.
Furthermore
, it
also
bring
a variety of benefits,
for instance
, varying the gender of the dominant
class
can offer
companies
diverse opinions and creative strategies for handling the challenges of the complicated economy.
However
, having the same number of
men
and
women
on all
positions
is
simply
unrealistic. A
company
should be free to appoint the best candidate for each
position
based on their qualifications, experience and
skills
, in order to contribute to the success of their business. In this way, both have same opportunities, and applicants know that they will be successful
only
if they work
hard
to achieve their goals.
In addition
, forcing
companies
to fulfill certain percentages will have adverse effect not
only
on the morale
but
the productivity of employees too. The goal of the
company
is to maximize its productivity
therefore
they
must
choose those who are able to demonstrate great adaptability from extensive knowledge in their field.
To conclude
,
undeniably
this practice will give
women
a platform to prove themselves.
However
, there should be other eligibility criteria in the selection process.