The economic progress of a country is being noted as a crucial goal of many governments. It is believed that the government focus more on developing the country’s economic status, while others claim that different types of progress must be given a fair approach. This essay will discuss both views in detail and argue why the first view is far more superior than the latter.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why economic advancement is vital in a country. Firstly, having a progressive economy attracts more tourists, which increases the tourism rate of a nation. According to a research, which was conducted in Japan, an increase tourism rate is directly proportional to economic progress. This is why the government invests a lot on tourism. Secondly, building streets and railways are possible due to this approach. For instance, in the Philippines, where economic development is not evident, fabricating railways are constrained, which is due to a limited budget. Lastly is the expanding work establishments and job opportunities. For example, in America, they have a lot of vacant positions open for job seekers due to there developed economy.
On the other hand, other types must also be given an equal attention. This includes health care, wherein the governance should take action about the expensive medical expenses and medicines. In addition, medical mission programs, such as free checkups, must be implemented in order to serve and reach the people who live in the remote areas. Furthermore, health benefits for employees and elderly must also be improved. Another is education, which must be given necessary action in order to decrease unemployment, which is a major problem in some countries. Moreover, giving free education and scholarships to people will enhance a person’s way of living.
In conclusion, it is indubitable that economic breakthrough must be prioritized, in order for the government to earn a budget, which will subsidize the other factors.
The
economic
progress of a
country
is
being noted
as a crucial goal of
many
governments
. It
is believed
that the
government
focus more on developing the
country’s
economic
status, while others claim that
different
types of progress
must
be
given
a
fair
approach. This essay will discuss both views in detail and argue why the
first
view is far
more superior than
the latter.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why
economic
advancement is vital in a
country
.
Firstly
, having a progressive economy attracts more tourists, which increases the tourism rate of a nation. According to a research, which
was conducted
in Japan, an increase tourism rate is
directly
proportional to
economic
progress. This is why the
government
invests a lot on tourism.
Secondly
, building streets and railways are possible due to this approach.
For instance
, in the Philippines, where
economic
development is not evident, fabricating railways
are constrained
, which is due to a limited budget.
Lastly
is the expanding work establishments and job opportunities.
For example
, in America, they have
a lot of
vacant positions open for job seekers due to there developed economy.
On the
other
hand,
other
types
must
also
be
given
an equal attention. This includes health care, wherein the governance should take action about the expensive medical expenses and medicines.
In addition
, medical mission programs, such as free checkups,
must
be implemented
in order to serve and reach the
people
who
live
in the remote areas.
Furthermore
, health benefits for employees and elderly
must
also
be
improved
. Another is education, which
must
be
given
necessary action in order to decrease unemployment, which is a major problem in
some
countries
.
Moreover
, giving free education and scholarships to
people
will enhance a person’s way of living.
In conclusion
, it is indubitable that
economic
breakthrough
must
be prioritized
, in order for the
government
to earn a budget, which will subsidize the
other
factors.