Many countries spend a lot of money in art. Some people think investment in art is necessary, but others say money is better spent on public services and facilities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Many countries spend a lot of money in art. Some people think investment in art is necessary, but others say money is better spent on public services and facilities. 5mlD
In the salad day of millennuium, the society is polarised into two groups almost equally regarding the notion that whether it is important to spend money on health and education services like hospital, schools etc or art. Different people have their distinct mindset the following paragraphs would shed light on both the approches before manking a final vote. To commence with the first notion, there are myraid things to be shared in it favour. First and foremost, health and education are things such as hospital and schools aredetermine the quality of our life that the most of us will have. For example, if the countries does not spend enough money on hospitals, our society may decline because people can't live without medicine. Secondly, health and education are also a good source to generate income for many countries. Consequently, this revnue helps to develop a country. Shifting towards the second school of thought, art can develop as hobbies and saved money can be directed towards urgent needs of the society. Hence, art is better way to earn money for any country. Morever, the art have also an essential part of life. Many people get pleasure to do what they want to do. Therefore, the countries assists such art institution so they can prove their ablility. Hammering the last nail, I personally feel that the countries should invest some part of their money. It's necessary for our society but health and education are part of life with these things life will become complicated and our society will become poor. That's why the countries should public service on first place.
In the salad day of
millennuium
, the
society
is
polarised
into two groups almost
equally
regarding the notion that whether it is
important
to spend
money
on
health
and
education
services like hospital, schools etc or
art
.
Different
people
have their distinct mindset the following paragraphs would shed light on both the
approches
before
manking
a final vote. To commence with the
first
notion, there are
myraid
things to
be shared
in it
favour
.
First
and foremost,
health
and
education
are things such as hospital and schools
aredetermine
the quality of our
life
that the most of us will have.
For example
, if the
countries
does not spend
enough
money
on hospitals, our
society
may decline
because
people
can't
live
without medicine.
Secondly
,
health
and
education
are
also
a
good
source to generate income for
many
countries
.
Consequently
, this
revnue
helps
to develop a
country
. Shifting towards the second school of
thought
,
art
can develop as hobbies and saved
money
can
be directed
towards urgent needs of the
society
.
Hence
,
art
is
better
way to earn
money
for any
country
.
Morever
, the
art
have
also
an essential part of
life
.
Many
people
get
pleasure to do what they want to do.
Therefore
, the
countries
assists such
art
institution
so
they can prove their
ablility
. Hammering the last nail, I
personally
feel that the
countries
should invest
some
part of their
money
. It's necessary for our
society
but
health
and
education
are part of
life
with these
things
life
will become complicated and our
society
will become poor. That's why the
countries
should public service on
first
place.