Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Many businesses choose to recruit from within their own company rather than sourcing staff from overseas. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

Many businesses choose to recruit from within their own company rather than sourcing staff from overseas. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? rjR6
Nowadays, most of the companies prefer recruiting people from within themselves as compared to sourcing from abroad. Although companies will save a lot of money and time when choosing people inside the firm, they will also lose cultural diversity and more talented persons. In my opinion, companies should consider people from overseas as they will bring in diversity and different talent. The greatest benefit of hiring people from abroad is that company will have cultural diversity with unique talent. People from another country brings in fresh perception with different thought process, which can help company to grow in different direction. In addition, this brings cultural diversity which creates positive environment within the company. For instance, in marketing strategies, people from different region in a team can come out with a better solution as compared to same region because the former one can imagine the case study with different perception. Thus, recruiting people from abroad can result in various advantages for the growth of the company. The main disadvantages is the time and cost of sponsoring for overseas people. When companies recruit the people from abroad, it takes longer period for them to join the company as compared to the people who are within organization. Also, the cost of other facilities like arranging work permit and initial accommodation, may not be in the budget of the company every time. For example, sponsoring a work permit and initial accommodation may result in 10000 CAD, which is an extra expense. The main challenge is time and cost when recruiting from abroad. Recruiting within company has become more common as compared to recruiting from overseas. The main advantage of considering people from abroad are they will bring diversity and talent. But, the challenges are increase cost of recruitment and will take more time. Still, I would say that bringing the foreign talent in the company can bring more benefits in longer run.
Nowadays, most of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
prefer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recruiting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
from within themselves as compared to sourcing from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
abroad
. Although
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
will save
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
money and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
when choosing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
inside the firm, they will
also
lose cultural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
diversity
and more talented persons. In my opinion,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
should consider
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
from overseas as they will
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bring
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
diversity
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
different
talent.

The greatest benefit of hiring
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
abroad
is that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
will have cultural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
diversity
with unique talent.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
People
from another country
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
brings
in fresh perception with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
different
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
process, which can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
to grow in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
different
direction.
In addition
, this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
brings
cultural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
diversity
which creates
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
environment within the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
.
For instance
, in marketing strategies,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
different
region in a team can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
come
out with a better solution as compared to same region
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
the former one can imagine the case study with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
different
perception.
Thus
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recruiting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
abroad
can result in various advantages for the growth of the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
company
.

The main disadvantages is the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cost
of sponsoring for overseas
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
. When
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
recruit the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
abroad
, it takes longer period for them to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
join
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
as compared to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who are within organization.
Also
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cost
of other facilities like arranging work permit and initial accommodation, may not be in the budget of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
every
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
.
For example
, sponsoring a work permit and initial accommodation may result in 10000 CAD, which is an extra expense. The main challenge is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cost
when
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recruiting
from abroad.

Recruiting within
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
has become more common as compared to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
recruiting
from overseas. The main advantage of considering
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
abroad
are they will
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bring
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
diversity
and talent.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
, the challenges are increase
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cost
of recruitment and will take more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
.
Still
, I would say that bringing the foreign talent in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
can
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
bring
more benefits in longer run.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Many businesses choose to recruit from within their own company rather than sourcing staff from overseas. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
318 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts