Many are of the view that news is best received through traditional newspapers while others feel that more modern media is preferable. In my opinion, despite the better habits engendered by reading the newspaper, it is impossible to argue convincingly against the convenience of newer mediums.
On the one hand, reading the newspaper allows for a healthy, distraction-free environment. This relates to both the content and the presentation of newspapers. Newspapers undergo rigorous editing and articles are necessarily published more slowly, allowing for better writing and fewer sensationalist headlines. An individual reading the newspaper can be compared to someone eating healthy foods or doing exercise. Similarly, newspapers are not vulnerable to the wide array of potential distractions on digital devices. There is less chance a newspaper reader will be distracted by social media or their personal communications.
On the other hand, there are a wide variety of functions only provided by more recent forms of media. Newspapers are primarily based on text, with images adding slight variety. In contrast, online media enables an individual to watch videos, listen to audio, cross-reference sources, consult primary sources, and generally take full advantage of the digital world. For example, a person who reads an article about a politician’s remarks can then check for the video in order to hear their words in context and later visit a site such as Twitter to analyze reactions from the general public, journalists, experts, and the politician. This information can then be easily shared through online messaging services or social media.
In conclusion, there are definite advantages to non-digital news sources, however, these are overshadowed by the versatility of modern media. It is the duty of individuals to ensure they enjoy the positives without the drawbacks of spending too much time online.
Many
are of the view that news is best received through traditional
newspapers
while others feel that more modern
media
is preferable. In my opinion, despite the better habits engendered by reading the
newspaper
, it is impossible to argue
convincingly
against the convenience of newer mediums.
On the one hand, reading the
newspaper
allows
for a healthy, distraction-free environment. This relates to both the content and the presentation of
newspapers
.
Newspapers
undergo rigorous editing and articles are
necessarily
published more
slowly
, allowing for better writing and fewer sensationalist headlines. An individual reading the
newspaper
can
be compared
to someone eating healthy foods or doing exercise.
Similarly
,
newspapers
are not vulnerable to the wide array of potential distractions on digital devices. There is less chance a
newspaper
reader will
be distracted
by social
media
or their personal communications.
On the other hand
, there are a wide variety of functions
only
provided by more recent forms of
media
.
Newspapers
are
primarily
based on text, with images adding slight variety.
In contrast
, online
media
enables an individual to
watch
videos, listen to audio, cross-reference sources, consult primary sources, and
generally
take full advantage of the digital world.
For example
, a person who reads an article about a politician’s remarks can then
check
for the video in order to hear their words in context and later visit a site such as Twitter to analyze reactions from the
general public
, journalists, experts, and the politician. This information can then be
easily
shared through online messaging services or social media.
In conclusion
, there are
definite
advantages to non-digital news sources,
however
, these
are overshadowed
by the versatility of modern
media
. It is the duty of individuals to ensure they enjoy the positives without the drawbacks of spending too much time online.