Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Legalized animal testing for pharmaceuticals

Legalized animal testing for pharmaceuticals K3Wj0
The truth that animal testing is the key to rapid medical advancement is undeniable. In ancient Greece, the dissection of human or animal corpses for study has been a huge moral argument so far, but without it, humanity wouldn't be so evolving and growing, especially in terms of scientific medical. Through the long path, the number of tested animals is not trivial. According to statistics from 2005, researchers tested over 115. 2 million animals. However, compared to the over 50 billion pounds of human meat consumed each year, animal testing for medical education accounted for only 0. 5 percent of that total. These decimal quantities are saved about millions of people from pestilence and be a big part of curing it by vaccinated and medicine. Therefore, Animal testing should be legal and acceptable for pharmaceutical products. There are other ways to replace this method in the world of technology, but alternatives to animal testing are dejectedly not effective enough. Scientists use them because it is necessary. Meanwhile, they keep finding other options, such as organs-on-a-chip (Stem cell) and using 3D printing to make the artificial ones. However, medical technology is not yet advanced enough to predict side effects on the body system and response to stimuli without conducting animal behavior studies. This is the reason that why we need to use and legalize them. Many people imagine that animal testing is just killing or torturing them, so they protest against it, and some have used violence, according to the news. But without knowing that there are existing international standards for it. It has been a long, morally intensive debate. Finally, it leads to compromise from both the opposition and the support team, which is the national standard of ethics for using animals for scientific work. The scientist is not doing it for fun. They also feel guilt about it as they did not see these animals just like that but saw them as coworkers. If there is no other practical way to do it, animal experimentation continues, but strictly under the ethics of using animals for scientific purposes. And this brings us to the last reason that science cannot be conducted without the use of experimental animals. Besides the experiments for drug production, food toxicity testing, and allergy testing, these animals can also be used to produce bio-based materials such as vaccines against disease and antiserums to cure snake venom, etc. Moreover, it even eliminates rabies and tetanus, two diseases that kill a lot of people. Animal testing and experimental animals are essential for scientific development. Nowadays, medical technology has been growing a lot, and I believe it is morally wrong to sacrifice an animal's life for human greed when there are alternatives to animal testing. It cannot be 100% gotten rid of, but surprisingly, 20% is. Humanity is certainly not neglecting animal testing, so here comes the agreement on the federal Animal Welfare Act and many other researchers' ethical obligations to take good care of them and make this a worthwhile sacrifice, as other methods are not that effective yet. So, legalized testing on animals for pharmaceuticals is important for scientific evolution. Eventually, the animal testing argument continues until there is an effective way to replace it. Whether we support it or not.
The truth that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
is the key to rapid
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medical
advancement is undeniable. In
If the term is a proper noun, use initial capitals.
ancient Greece
, the dissection of human or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
corpses for study has been a huge moral argument
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
far,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
without it, humanity wouldn't be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
evolving and growing,
especially
in terms of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientific
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medical
. Through the long path, the number of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
is not trivial. According to statistics from 2005, researchers
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
over 115. 2 million
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
However
, compared to the over 50 billion pounds of human meat consumed each year,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medical
education accounted for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
0. 5 percent of that total. These decimal quantities
are saved
about millions of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
from pestilence and be a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
part of curing it by vaccinated and medicine.
Therefore
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
should be legal and acceptable for pharmaceutical products.

There are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
ways to replace this method in the world of technology,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
alternatives to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
are
dejectedly
not effective
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
. Scientists
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
them
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it is necessary. Meanwhile, they
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
finding
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
options, such as organs-on-a-chip (Stem cell) and using 3D printing to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
the artificial ones.
However
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medical
technology is not
yet
advanced
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
to predict side effects on the body system and response to stimuli without conducting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
behavior studies. This is the reason that why we need to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
and legalize them.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
imagine that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
killing or torturing them,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
they protest against it, and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
have
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
violence, according to the news.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
without knowing that there are existing international standards for it. It has been a long,
morally
intensive debate.
Finally
, it leads to compromise from both the opposition and the support team, which is the national standard of ethics for using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientific
work. The scientist is not doing it for fun. They
also
feel guilt about it as they did not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
like that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
saw
them as coworkers. If there is no
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
practical way to do it,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
experimentation continues,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
strictly
under the ethics of using
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientific
purposes.

And this brings us to the last reason that science cannot
be conducted
without the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of experimental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
Besides
the experiments for drug production, food toxicity
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
, and allergy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
, these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
can
also
be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
to produce bio-based materials such as vaccines against disease and antiserums to cure snake venom, etc.
Moreover
, it even eliminates rabies and tetanus, two diseases that kill
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
a lot of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
and experimental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
are essential for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientific
development.

Nowadays,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
medical
technology has been growing a lot, and I believe it is
morally
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
to sacrifice an animal's life for human greed when there are alternatives to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
. It cannot be 100% gotten rid of,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
surprisingly
, 20% is. Humanity is
certainly
not neglecting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
here
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
comes
the agreement on the federal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Animal
Welfare Act and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
researchers' ethical obligations to take
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
care of them and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
this a worthwhile sacrifice, as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
methods are not that effective
yet
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, legalized
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
for pharmaceuticals is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
scientific
evolution.
Eventually
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
argument continues until there is an effective way to replace it. Whether we support it or not.

IELTS essay Legalized animal testing for pharmaceuticals

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
544 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Legalized animal testing for pharmaceuticals