Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

large proportion of people live and work in other countries today than at any time in the past. it is very proble that in the future there will be no borders and people will be freely between countries. To what extent do you agree with this opinion.

large proportion of people live and work in other countries today than at any time in the past. it is very proble that in the future there will be no borders and people will be freely between countries. G71g

Nowadays, there are so many people live and work in other countries, and it became common with us. I’m totally disagree that there will no more international borders in the future and we will able to work and live in as many countries as we want. On the one hand, open borders may help people have more opportunities to find a good place to live or find a well-paid job to do in some wealthy countries. Secondly, those countries may be overpopulated because of refugees and immigrants, who come to find jobs and a good environment to live in. And the crime rate might rise extremely high. At the same, we would lose our national identity if we reside in a different country and live with local people for a long time, about 10 or 20 years and we will able to forget our own language. In my opinion, it would cause some problems if we open the international borders like damage the nature, destroy animal’s habitats. The amount of immigrants increase also lead to the requirement of housing, apartments. That is why we have to cut down tree, exploit the forest to build houses and places to people, and the natural materials will be exhausted soon in the future. Vehicles is indispensable factor for people, and the emissions of cars and bikes can make dramatically problem to nature. In conclusion, open international borders may have some benefits for the world but for me, there are more disadvantages of opening borders than the advantages it will make to our life.

Nowadays, there are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withalive
live
 and work in other You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
, and it became common with us. I’m totally
Consider using a past participle here: "disagreed".disagreed
disagree
 that there will no more international You use this word too often, consider replacing it withboundarylineoutskirt
borders
 in the Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).future, and
future and
 we Did you mean "will be able"?will be able
will able
 to work and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withalive
live
 in as This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 as we want.

On the one hand, open You use this word too often, consider replacing it withboundarylineoutskirt
borders
 may This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assistassistance
help
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 have more opportunities to find a This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 place to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withalive
live
 or find a well-paid job to do in This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 wealthy You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
. Secondly
, those You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 may be overpopulated
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of refugees and immigrants, who This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :approacharrive
come
 to find jobs and a This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 environment to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withalive
live
 in. And the crime rate might rise extremely
 high.

At the same, we would lose our national identity if we reside in a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrusticbucolichomeyagrarianprovincial
country
 and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withalive
live
 with local You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 for a long time, about 10 or 20 Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).years, and
years and
 we Did you mean "will be able"?will be able
will able
 to forget our This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
 language. In my opinion, it would cause This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 problems if we open the international You use this word too often, consider replacing it withboundarylineoutskirt
borders
 like damage the nature, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demolishruin
destroy
 animal’s habitats. The amount of immigrants Possible agreement error. Did you mean "increases"? (Some collective nouns can be treated as both singular and plural, so 'increase' is not always incorrect.)increases
increase
also
 lead to the requirement of housing, apartments. That is
 why we This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :minimize
cut
 down tree, exploit the forest to build This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :residences
houses
 and places to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
, and the natural materials will be exhausted
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:in the near future
soon
 in the future. Vehicles You should probably use: "are" or "were".arewere
is
 indispensable factor for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
, and the emissions of cars and bikes can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
dramatically
 problem to nature.

In conclusion
, open international You use this word too often, consider replacing it withboundarylineoutskirt
borders
 may have This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 benefits for the world This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 for me, there are more disadvantages of opening You use this word too often, consider replacing it withboundarylineoutskirt
borders
 than the advantages it will This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 to our life. 