It is hard to overstate the importance of schooling: it illuminates a person's mind, enables individuals to do the analysis while making life decisions and ultimately guides humans to fight with failure as well as get success in the future. Therefore, what teaching strategies formulated to facilitate improvements in a student's accuracy is neccessarily a perennial debate. A school of thought holds that language educators should focus on reinforcing leaners' outcomes with good responses in stead of directly criticizing their bad results. I personally agree with this thinking for the reasons below. The first justification is that positive feedback would boost confidence, motivation and show the value of students. Specifically, nice comments have a bearing on youngsters' egotism, self-competence, and beliefs about their ability to be successful at tasks. Besides, schoolchildren are often positively receptive to responses give in the context of supportive, non-threatening learning enviroment. Take praise as an example, it is surveyed that approximately 70% of elementary schoolkids love compliments rather than reprimands. Thus, providing school-goers with constructing feedback is an ideal way to enhance students' academic performance. In addition to this, teachers' consistent use of rebukes may have long-term effects on students' behavior by causing them to develop negative self-perceptions. It is apparent that teachers typically use unconstructive statements to change pupils' way of learning, whether that be to prevent a disruptive bhaviour or to force them to study in earnest. However, these reprimands tend to be counterproductive, and nonspecific, schoolkids are inclined to engage in their way regardless of teachers' endeavours. In conclusion, I am of the opinion that instructors should concentrate on encouraging feedback rather than admonitions in order to fortify young learners' learning process.
It is
hard
to overstate the importance of schooling: it illuminates a person's mind, enables individuals to do the analysis while making life decisions and
ultimately
guides humans to fight with failure
as well
as
get
success in the future.
Therefore
, what teaching strategies formulated to facilitate improvements in a student's accuracy is
neccessarily
a perennial debate. A school of
thought
holds that language educators should focus on reinforcing
leaners
' outcomes with
good
responses
in stead of
directly
criticizing their
bad
results. I
personally
agree
with this thinking for the reasons below. The
first
justification is that
positive
feedback would boost confidence, motivation and
show
the value of students.
Specifically
, nice comments have a bearing on youngsters' egotism, self-competence, and beliefs about their ability to be successful at tasks.
Besides
, schoolchildren are
often
positively
receptive to responses give in the context of supportive, non-threatening learning
enviroment
. Take praise as an example, it
is surveyed
that approximately 70% of elementary schoolkids
love
compliments
rather
than reprimands.
Thus
, providing school-goers with constructing feedback is an ideal way to enhance students' academic performance.
In addition
to this, teachers' consistent
use
of rebukes may have long-term effects on students' behavior by causing them to develop
negative
self-perceptions. It is apparent that teachers
typically
use
unconstructive statements to
change
pupils' way of learning, whether that be to
prevent
a disruptive
bhaviour
or to force them to study in earnest.
However
, these reprimands tend to be counterproductive, and nonspecific, schoolkids
are inclined
to engage in their way regardless of teachers'
endeavours
.
In conclusion
, I am of the opinion that instructors should concentrate on encouraging feedback
rather
than admonitions in order to fortify young learners' learning process.