It is undeniable that allocating money for possessing merchandise which are imitated from the other countries has been prevalent in this cutting-edge era. Although this phenomenon brings certain negative points, the positive aspects are much more predominant.
Obtaining no uniqueness and diminishing the feeling of exploration are the reasons why many people subscribe to the view that securing products resembling products from other places could bring about disadvantages. Lacking of having monopoly on certain items could restrict and alleviate the countries' influence. This is because every nation desires to retain their own special features for attracting the public's attention, which could gain reputation and disseminate their goods to every corner of the world. Therefore, the place where corporations imitate the items originated from specific regions would not expand the nations' image and gain profits from myriad fields such as tourism, commerce and so on. Reducing the captivating sense of examination could be another factors making this ideas inevitable. When someone commutes to new regions, they all have a yearn for searching unique and brand new furniture in these states. If there are no highlights about food, items, or goods, tourists, or visitors could not have inspiration for seeking and evaluating the dominant features in these places.
Despite the aforementioned drawbacks, I opine that the potential points of such a trend strongly eclipse such downsides in the long term. Enhancing the convenience for every shoppers could be the compelling reason for supporting the presence of items derived from the others. In this day and age, purchasers all strive for specialised items without long-haul destinations, thus, the advent of similar items in this nation should subsidise the customers to secure the goods immediately without difficulties. Moreover, duplicating other advanced countries' products meeting buyers' demands about up-to-date items. For example, car production has been an industry that has always been innovated and evaluated in some countries, bringing good points to drivers, hence, applying and utilizing the parts which could refurbish users' cars and serve the human being's needs.
In conclusion, the absence of a nation's identity and sense of investigation could be two main culprits that regions should not produce similar items compared to the other countries. Yet, I hold a belief that such shortcomings are not enough to justify the upsides of these issues because of accessibility and satisfy buyers' needs, which can make this idea become a worthwhile path.
It is undeniable that allocating money for possessing merchandise which
are imitated
from the
other
countries has been prevalent in this cutting-edge era. Although this phenomenon brings certain
negative
points, the
positive
aspects are much more predominant.
Obtaining no uniqueness and diminishing the feeling of exploration are the reasons why
many
people
subscribe to the view that securing products resembling products from
other
places could bring about disadvantages. Lacking of having monopoly on certain
items
could restrict and alleviate the countries' influence. This is
because
every nation desires to retain their
own
special features for attracting the public's attention, which could gain reputation and disseminate their
goods
to every corner of the world.
Therefore
, the place where corporations imitate the
items
originated from specific regions would not expand the nations' image and gain profits from myriad fields such as tourism, commerce and
so
on. Reducing the captivating sense of examination could be another factors making this
ideas
inevitable. When someone commutes to new regions, they all have
a yearn
for searching unique and
brand new
furniture in these states. If there are no highlights about food,
items
, or
goods
, tourists, or visitors could not have inspiration for seeking and evaluating the dominant features in these places.
Despite the aforementioned drawbacks, I opine that the potential points of such a trend
strongly
eclipse such downsides in the long term. Enhancing the convenience for every
shoppers
could be the compelling reason for supporting the presence of
items
derived from the others. In this day and age, purchasers all strive for
specialised
items
without long-haul destinations,
thus
, the advent of similar
items
in this nation should
subsidise
the customers to secure the
goods
immediately without difficulties.
Moreover
, duplicating
other
advanced countries' products meeting buyers' demands about up-to-date
items
.
For example
, car production has been an industry that has always
been innovated
and evaluated in
some
countries, bringing
good
points to drivers,
hence
, applying and utilizing the parts which could refurbish users' cars and serve the human being's needs.
In conclusion
, the absence of a nation's identity and sense of investigation could be two main culprits that regions should not produce similar
items
compared to the
other
countries.
Yet
, I hold a belief that such shortcomings are not
enough
to justify the upsides of these issues
because
of accessibility and satisfy buyers' needs, which can
make
this
idea
become a worthwhile path.