Nowadays, preservation of the old instructors cost a significant amount of money. While some people have a conviction that this money would be spent to build modern infrastructures, I will elaborate in this essay why I am a strong oppose of this approach.
First and foremost, historic buildings in each place are representative of the culture of corresponding period. Many of them has been recorded in UNESCO since they are nations’ history. For instance, Isfahan is a cultural heritage of Iran and this fact is clearly visible from its stony constructions with magnificent paintings back to several centuries ago. Undoubtedly, the level of expenditures on restoring such buildings is high but it is worth. Furthermore, the tourism industry of some countries strongly attached to these memorable buildings so that they can make a lot of money which can be replaces in turns of the amount which has been spent.
Another vital fact that should be taken into consideration is that living in modern buildings equipped with modern facilities become an inevitable part of today’s life. Having access to the latest technologies such as automation lighting which most of the people are accustomed to use them, could be very deceptive. Moreover, applying such facilities for modern building with proper infrastructures would be far cheaper in terms of expenses such as disposal, reassembling the materials and consulting fee of the experts who should confirm the renewing the building. Therefore, economically it does not make sense.
On the basis of the point mentioned above, old monuments tell us about the history and we are not allowed to not maintain them with the excuse of waste of money. Even so, buildings that cannot be restored should be destroyed
Nowadays, preservation of the
old
instructors cost a significant amount of
money
. While
some
people
have a conviction that this
money
would
be spent
to build
modern
infrastructures, I will elaborate in this essay why I am a strong oppose of this approach.
First
and foremost, historic
buildings
in each place are representative of the culture of corresponding period.
Many
of them has
been recorded
in UNESCO since they are nations’ history.
For instance
, Isfahan is a cultural heritage of Iran and this fact is
clearly
visible from its stony constructions with magnificent paintings back to several centuries ago.
Undoubtedly
, the level of expenditures on restoring such
buildings
is high
but
it is worth.
Furthermore
, the tourism industry of
some
countries
strongly
attached to these memorable
buildings
so
that they can
make
a lot of
money
which can be
replaces
in turns of the amount which has
been spent
.
Another vital fact that should
be taken
into consideration is that living in
modern
buildings
equipped with
modern
facilities become an inevitable part of
today
’s life. Having access to the latest technologies such as automation lighting which most of the
people
are accustomed
to
use
them, could be
very
deceptive.
Moreover
, applying such facilities for
modern
building
with proper infrastructures would be far cheaper in terms of expenses such as disposal, reassembling the materials and consulting fee of the experts who should confirm the renewing the
building
.
Therefore
,
economically
it does not
make
sense.
On the basis of the point mentioned above,
old
monuments
tell
us about the
history and
we are not
allowed
to not maintain them with the excuse of waste of
money
. Even
so
,
buildings
that cannot
be restored
should be
destroyed