It is often argued that helping people all over the world seems infeasible; therefore, the government should meet their own individual’s needs. While I admit that there are some drawbacks, I completely agree with this statement.
It is often argued that helping people all over the world seems infeasible; therefore, the government should meet their own individual’s needs. While I admit that there are some drawbacks, I completely agree with this statement. 8Gjxm
It is often argued that helping people all over the world seems infeasible; therefore, the government should meet their own individual’s needs. While I admit that there are some drawbacks, I completely agree with this statement.
On the one hand, by supporting other nations, authorities could guarantee their future when they get into trouble. To illustrate, the government could establish a connection among one another to create a dependency, shaped by aid. For instance, a country like Iran always makes a significant contribution to its neighbours in harsh situations; leading to a plethora of advocating. Moreover, due to the humanitarian sense, it necessitates that countries help each other. On the whole, whilst it seems impossible to support all general populations all over the globe, governments could supply several nations for critical times.
On the other hand, the role of the government in meeting people’s needs is indispensable. That is to say, every country should furnish the welfare of their populations, due to the fact that people are the foundation of every state. It means, if governments do not pay attention to people’s demands, they will be potentially no longer survive. For example, in past decades, Not only did the unsatisfactory of individuals in Iran lead to riots, but also they decided to alter the regime. That is why the government should adequately finance people in the first place.
To conclude, although governments by advocating just individuals from their own country lose some supports, in my opinion, it ultimately leads to satisfaction of their own society.
It is
often
argued that helping
people
all over the world seems infeasible;
therefore
, the
government
should
meet
their
own
individual’s needs. While I admit that there are
some
drawbacks, I completely
agree
with this statement.
On the one hand, by supporting other nations, authorities could guarantee their future when they
get
into trouble. To illustrate, the
government
could establish a connection among one another to create a dependency, shaped by aid.
For instance
, a
country
like Iran always
makes
a significant contribution to its
neighbours
in harsh situations; leading to a plethora of advocating.
Moreover
, due to the humanitarian sense, it necessitates that
countries
help
each other.
On the whole
, whilst it seems impossible to support all general populations all over the globe,
governments
could supply several nations for critical times.
On the other hand
, the role of the
government
in meeting
people’s
needs is indispensable.
That is
to say, every
country
should furnish the welfare of their populations, due to the fact that
people
are the foundation of every state. It means, if
governments
do not pay attention to
people’s
demands, they will be
potentially
no longer survive.
For example
, in past decades, Not
only
did
the unsatisfactory of
individuals in Iran lead to riots,
but
also
they decided to alter the regime.
That is
why the
government
should
adequately
finance
people
in the
first
place.
To conclude
, although
governments
by advocating
just
individuals from their
own
country
lose
some
supports, in my opinion, it
ultimately
leads to satisfaction of their
own
society.