Smoking is injurious to health. Many countries have taken one step forward and it has been made illegal for people to smoke in all public places and they have provided designated areas where any one can smoke freely without affecting any common man.
I strongly agree with the statement that smoking kills and countries should make some rules and regulations for it. I further endorse it with the view that, it has a consensus that smoking affects the health and also it is a root cause of many major diseases. It not only stresses the lungs but also causes cancer. Moreover, smoking in public area can also indulge others around in passive smoking. e. g. a few individuals are allergic to smoke, when they are beside a smoker their allergy can trigger headache and cause other health issues.
I would like to supplement my view point with the help of an example that numerous countries have controlled smoking by restricting it to a specific area. e. g in planes, public are not allowed to do smoking. They have installed smoking detectors. Furthermore, in many corporate sectors people are not allowed to do smoking in office environment and not even on their desk. they have to go to parking area or to the designated place to do smoking. In addition to it, government has erected signboards on different places to display non-smoking area. Additionally, government strictly instructed smoking companies to add a caption of “injurious to health” on pack of cigarettes. Which can indicate and provide awareness of health issues to public.
There are more than 7 billion people on the face of earth planet. Everybody thinks differently. One man’s wine may be another’s poison. Similarly, a few people think that ban on smoking will decline the business of cigarette which ultimately makes many people go unemployed. Also it will lessen the major income of government which they get in form of taxes from these items.
To cap up the topic, it could be justified that lawmakers cannot ban the smoking completely, nevertheless they can reduce it by defining a specific smoking area. However, they can make public aware of health concerns by taking these measures.
Smoking
is injurious to
health
.
Many
countries have taken one step forward and it has
been made
illegal for
people
to smoke in all
public
places and
they have provided designated
areas
where
any one
can smoke
freely
without affecting any common
man
.
I
strongly
agree
with the statement that
smoking
kills and countries should
make
some
rules
and regulations for it. I
further
endorse it with the view that, it has a consensus that
smoking
affects the
health
and
also
it is a root cause of
many
major diseases. It not
only
stresses
the lungs
but
also
causes cancer.
Moreover
,
smoking
in
public
area
can
also
indulge others around in passive
smoking
.
e. g.
a few individuals are allergic to smoke, when they are beside a smoker their allergy can trigger headache and cause other
health
issues.
I would like to supplement my view point with the
help
of an example that numerous countries have controlled
smoking
by restricting it to a specific
area
. e. g in
planes
,
public
are not
allowed
to do
smoking
. They have installed
smoking
detectors.
Furthermore
, in
many
corporate sectors
people
are not
allowed
to do
smoking
in office environment and not even on their desk.
they
have to
go to parking
area
or to the designated place to do
smoking
.
In addition
to it,
government
has erected signboards on
different
places to display non-smoking
area
.
Additionally
,
government
strictly
instructed
smoking
companies
to
add
a caption of “injurious to
health”
on pack of cigarettes. Which can indicate and provide awareness of
health
issues to public.
There are more than 7 billion
people
on the face of earth planet. Everybody
thinks
differently
. One
man
’s wine may be another’s poison.
Similarly
, a few
people
think
that ban on
smoking
will decline the business of cigarette which
ultimately
makes
many
people
go unemployed.
Also
it will lessen the major income of
government
which they
get
in form of taxes from these items.
To cap up the topic, it could
be justified
that lawmakers cannot ban the
smoking
completely,
nevertheless
they can
reduce
it by defining a specific
smoking
area
.
However
, they can
make
public
aware of
health
concerns by taking these measures.