It is considered that by some people, students should decide their own field which they will study in university. While there are others who think only jobs which will be more demanded in future should be permitted to students. In my opinion, the free decision of students is good for their own approach to the field, at the same time constraining the subjects is beneficial for the future of country and individual.
On the one hand, every student has dissimilar priorities, characteristic features and dreams that are influential in their decisions. While some students are skilled in math, others are able to comprehend the history easily. If government constrains the subjects that are thought by some to lose their essentiality, it could affect the performance and enthusiasm of the students who used to interest in these subjects. For instance, there are people who do not tend to do their job with passion, because they have not graduated from the field which they wanted to study.
On the other hand, government should only allow the subjects that have potential in order to diminish the rate of unemployment. From notion of education to job requirements, everything has been changed through the advancement of technology. To prove the statement, people who graduated from the fields which have encountered with the jeopardy of disappearing suffer from finding a good job. According to preserve next generation from mentioned danger, the certain group of subjects should be avoided.
I assume that although reducing the unemployment rate is necessary for the country, students should choose their own goal. Because there are also other ways to prevent this problem, and fields which can not keep pace with the requirements of the modern world will be vanished gradually.
In conclusion, both views have their own right aspects, and the significance of this topic can change in the near future with the rapid improvement of technology.
It
is considered
that by
some
people
,
students
should decide their
own
field
which they will study in university.
While
there are others
who
think
only
jobs
which will be more demanded in future should
be permitted
to
students
. In my opinion, the free decision of
students
is
good
for their
own
approach to the
field
, at the same time constraining the
subjects
is beneficial for the future of country and individual.
On the one hand, every
student
has dissimilar priorities, characteristic features and dreams that are influential in their decisions. While
some
students
are skilled
in math, others are able to comprehend the history
easily
. If
government
constrains the
subjects
that are
thought
by
some
to lose their
essentiality
, it could affect the performance and enthusiasm of the
students
who
used
to interest in these
subjects
.
For instance
, there are
people
who
do not tend to do their
job
with passion,
because
they have not graduated from the
field
which they wanted to study.
On the
other
hand,
government
should
only
allow
the
subjects
that have potential in order to diminish the rate of unemployment. From notion of education to
job
requirements, everything has been
changed
through the advancement of technology. To prove the statement,
people
who
graduated from the
fields
which have encountered with the jeopardy of disappearing suffer from finding a
good
job
. According to preserve
next
generation from mentioned
danger
, the certain group of
subjects
should
be avoided
.
I assume that although reducing the unemployment rate is necessary for the country,
students
should choose their
own
goal.
Because
there are
also
other
ways to
prevent
this problem, and
fields
which can not
keep
pace with the requirements of the modern world will
be vanished
gradually
.
In conclusion
, both views have their
own
right aspects, and the significance of this topic can
change
in the near future with the rapid improvement of technology.