Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

It is believed by some that, on the safety of wild animal administration utilise extra capital while, others contented that, it could be more valuable if they are spending more money on the people. While I agree with this situation, I also believe that higher authorities give equal significance to the animal. On the one hand, spending money on the human population could be best. firstly due to advancement in technology the rate of every consumer able things is high by this most of the people cannot earn properly in the world and they have not any earning source if the wealthy people or government utilise more money on poor people it is good for the poor people. Because it disappeared the poverty level in the country. For example, in India because of the heavy population is hard for authorities to give employment to every person if they could spending more money on those who are not a name it is more beneficial for the nation. On the other hand, it is equally important if they use th

It is believed by some that, on the safety of wild animal administration utilise extra capital while, others contented that, it could be more valuable if they are spending more money on the people. While I agree with this situation, I also believe that higher authorities give equal significance to the animal. On the one hand, spending money on the human population could be best. firstly due to advancement in technology the rate of every consumer able things is high by this most of the people cannot earn properly in the world and they have not any earning source if the wealthy people or government utilise more money on poor people it is good for the poor people. Because it disappeared the poverty level in the country. For example, in India because of the heavy population is hard for authorities to give employment to every person if they could spending more money on those who are not a name it is more beneficial for the nation. On the other hand, it is equally important if they use th 6Qkx
It is believed by some that, on the safety of wild animal administration utilise extra capital while, others contented that, it could be more valuable if they are spending more money on the people. While I agree with this situation, I also believe that higher authorities give equal significance to the animal. On the one hand, spending money on the human population could be best. firstly due to advancement in technology the rate of every consumer able things is high by this most of the people cannot earn properly in the world and they have not any earning source if the wealthy people or government utilise more money on poor people it is good for the poor people. Because it disappeared the poverty level in the country. For example, in India because of the heavy population is hard for authorities to give employment to every person if they could spending more money on those who are not a name it is more beneficial for the nation. On the other hand, it is equally important if they use the call money on the animal because species are part of the ecosystem. Firstly, nowadays most of the water animal are infected with the garbage those people or industry through into the ocean government utilise more money on that situation because it is good for the environment as well as to marine animals. Besides, currently, numerous animal are infected with climate change and they are called in danger species administration more money spending on it because they promote more places to animal it assists to maintain the eco-chain of the species. In conclusion, I would like to reiterate that government spending equal funding on both people and animals going to both have their significance.
It
is believed
by
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
that, on the safety of wild
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
administration
Possible spelling mistake. 'utilise' is British English.
utilise
extra capital while, others contented that, it could be more valuable if they are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spending
more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
. While I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with this situation, I
also
believe that higher authorities give equal significance to the animal.

On the one hand,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spending
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
on the human population could be best.
This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
firstly
due to advancement in technology the rate of every consumer able things is high by this most of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
cannot earn
properly
in the
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
world and
they have not any earning source if the wealthy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
or
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
Possible spelling mistake. 'utilise' is British English.
utilise
more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
on poor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
it is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
for the poor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
.
“Because” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Because
it disappeared the poverty level in the country.
For example
, in India
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of the heavy population is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
hard
for authorities to give employment to every person if they could
The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: "spend"
spending
more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
on those who are not a name it is more beneficial for the nation.

On the other hand
, it is
equally
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
if they
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
the call
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
species are part of the ecosystem.
Firstly
, nowadays most of the water
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
are infected
with the garbage those
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
or industry through into the ocean
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
Possible spelling mistake. 'utilise' is British English.
utilise
more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
on that situation
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
for the environment
as well
as to marine
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
Besides
,
currently
, numerous
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
are infected
with climate
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
change and
they
are called
in
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
danger
species administration more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
money
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spending
on it
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
they promote more places to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
it assists to maintain the
Possible spelling mistake found.
eco-chain
of the species.

In conclusion
, I would like to reiterate that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
spending
equal funding on both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
going to both have their significance.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay It is believed by some that, on the safety of wild animal administration utilise extra capital while, others contented that, it could be more valuable if they are spending more money on the people. While I agree with this situation, I also believe that higher authorities give equal significance to the animal. On the one hand, spending money on the human population could be best. firstly due to advancement in technology the rate of every consumer able things is high by this most of the people cannot earn properly in the world and they have not any earning source if the wealthy people or government utilise more money on poor people it is good for the poor people. Because it disappeared the poverty level in the country. For example, in India because of the heavy population is hard for authorities to give employment to every person if they could spending more money on those who are not a name it is more beneficial for the nation. On the other hand, it is equally important if they use th

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
291 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts