It is argued that despite of many nesseccery issues in the country, regime spend financial resources to save wild animal. This essay fully agree with viewpoint because wildlife not only brings bio diversity but also maintain food chain.
It is argued that despite of many nesseccery issues in the country, regime spend financial resources to save wild animal. This essay fully agree with viewpoint because wildlife not only brings bio diversity but also maintain food chain. Mly1N
Although, spending money on forest life could be expensive, but it is not loss because protecting wild animal saves the biodiversity on the earth. To elaborate it, forest is full of numerous species of animals which is survive on trees, plants and prey and it is biodiversity. But, hunters kill them illigaly in a big number to make some money which is seen as a danger for the diversity of forest, it can effect number of animal also it species. Therfore, government should protect wild life. For example, in 2008, indian government pass a bill to protect the animals and they increased the number of forest gurad.
yet, another reason why government should invest money to save century life is that it make sure survival of food chain. To explain it, each and every creatour need food to survive and they are depend on each other, even human is also part of this food chain. If anyone miss from here, it could unbalance this chain which can harm the existence many of them. Therefore, to keep alive this chain, authorties should spend its financial resources on wild life. For example, indian government had made lot of to make survive of tiger in 2008. When it was about to extinct, because it main part of food chain.
To conclude, investing money on forest and its life is not wasting of money because it keep alive bio diversty and food chain as well.
Although, spending
money
on
forest
life
could be expensive,
but
it is not loss
because
protecting wild
animal
saves the biodiversity on the earth. To elaborate it,
forest
is full of numerous species of
animals
which is
survive
on trees, plants and prey and it is biodiversity.
But
, hunters kill them
illigaly
in a
big
number to
make
some
money
which is
seen
as a
danger
for the diversity of
forest
, it can effect number of
animal
also
it species
.
Therfore
,
government
should protect wild
life
.
For example
, in 2008,
indian
government
pass a bill to protect the
animals and
they increased the number of
forest
gurad
.
yet
, another reason why
government
should invest
money
to save century
life
is that it
make
sure survival of
food
chain
. To
explain
it, each and every
creatour
need
food
to
survive and
they are
depend
on each other, even human is
also
part of this
food
chain
. If anyone
miss
from here, it could unbalance this
chain
which can harm the existence
many
of them.
Therefore
, to
keep
alive this
chain
,
authorties
should spend its financial resources on wild
life
.
For example
,
indian
government
had made
lot of
to
make
survive of tiger in 2008. When it was about to extinct,
because
it
main part of
food
chain.
To conclude
, investing
money
on
forest
and its
life
is not wasting of
money
because
it
keep
alive bio
diversty
and
food
chain
as well
.