Sentencing death penalty for a shockingly evil sin is a common belief. On the contrary, there are some counter belief that life long sentence could be a better deterrant to capital punishment. This essay will discuss both the views as measures to prevent serious mishaps. Firstly, death sentences gives a relieve to the victim and their family members. However, leading a life is everyone's right and cannot be violated.
People who are involved in a wicked crimes like murder, rape should be punished in a way that sets an example in a society that such crimes leads to legalized killing. If criminals are not punished by judiciary in a right manner, such mindset takes it for granted and keep on doing the crimes without any fear. Alongside, it will also saves a lot of money of taxpayers as money is utilized in jail for keeping them alive. Serious judgments are must for any dreadful crimes. For example, Saudi Arabia has a provision for a capital punishment for any heinous crimes and that is the reason they have less cases for such terrible cases.
On the contrary, some people advocates that lifelong sentence is another way of giving judgment for a horrible crimes. They believe that living a life is everyone's right and this cannot be snatched from anybody because they are involved in any criminal activity. By such action, opportunity is been provided to criminals to go for a rehabilitation. For example, in Nirbhya case, driver of the bus in which crimes was taken place, sentenced to a life long imprisonment instead of judicial murder. A few developing nations have increased rate of crimes over the years due to their liberal policies.
In conclusion, the beliefs over penalties in the form of hanging till last breadth or lifelong sentence are withheld with their respective pointers like forging an example in criminals mindset with a constrating view of having a life with an opportunity to change their life. This essay has discussed both the views by their supporting illustration.
Sentencing death penalty for a
shockingly
evil sin is a common belief.
On the contrary
, there are
some
counter belief that
life
long
sentence
could be a better
deterrant
to capital punishment. This essay will discuss both the views as measures to
prevent
serious mishaps.
Firstly
, death
sentences
gives a
relieve
to the victim and their family members.
However
, leading a
life
is everyone's right and cannot
be violated
.
People
who
are involved
in a wicked
crimes
like murder, rape should
be punished
in a way that sets an
example
in a society that such
crimes
leads to legalized killing. If
criminals
are not punished by judiciary
in a right manner
, such mindset takes it for granted and
keep
on doing the
crimes
without any fear. Alongside, it will
also
saves
a lot of
money of taxpayers as money
is utilized
in jail for keeping them alive. Serious judgments are
must
for any dreadful
crimes
. For
example
, Saudi Arabia has a provision for a capital punishment for any heinous
crimes
and
that is
the reason they have
less
cases for such terrible cases.
On the contrary
,
some
people
advocates
that lifelong
sentence
is another way of giving judgment for a horrible
crimes
. They believe that living a
life
is everyone's right and this cannot
be snatched
from anybody
because
they
are involved
in any
criminal
activity. By such action, opportunity
is been
provided to
criminals
to go for a rehabilitation. For
example
, in
Nirbhya
case, driver of the bus in which
crimes
was taken
place, sentenced to a
life
long imprisonment
instead
of judicial murder. A few developing nations have increased rate of
crimes
over the years due to their liberal policies.
In conclusion
, the beliefs over penalties in the form of hanging till last breadth or lifelong
sentence
are withheld
with their respective pointers like forging an
example
in
criminals
mindset with a
constrating
view of having a
life
with an opportunity to
change
their
life
. This essay has discussed both the views by their supporting illustration.