Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Interviews from the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However,some people think that an interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagre

Interviews from the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that an interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagre PYL2
In the modern era, it is undeniable the most companies rely on interviews for hiring new employees but some people believe that this dependence on interviews is worng and other alternative should be preferred as they are better. I believe that interviews are a reliable method, and the other method cannot be considered more effective. To begin with, there are many reasons why interviews are suitable for hiring new employees. Firstly, by the interview the recruiters can get an idea about the personality and social skills of the potential employees. In interviews, there is face-to-face interaction, and the candidates have to answer impromptu questions, employees can judge traits like ability to handle pressure, confidence and ability to think outside the box In addition, although there are many other method for hiring, none of them could be considered superior to interviews. One of other common methods is the written test, which is good to judge the theoretical knowledge of the person. However, this method cannot give a good idea about the personality of the candidates. By contrast, through interviews, employers can judge both the knowledge and temperament of the potential employee. Moreover, the written test is fallible to cheating as sometimes candidates can take outside help. Another selection process is group discussion, which is good where a major job requirement is conversational and persuasion skills for instance sales jobs. They are really not suited for technical jobs because these are not customer oriented. On the other hand, interviews hold good for any type of job as interviews can frame questions to test the particular skills they require. To conclude, I would like to reiterate that preference for interview for hiring among employers is justified as interviews have advantages over other commonly adopted methods
In the modern era, it is undeniable the most
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
rely on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
hiring
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
believe that this dependence on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
is
Possible spelling mistake found.
worng
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
alternative should
be preferred
as they are better. I believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
are a reliable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
, and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
cannot
be considered
more effective.

To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with, there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
reasons why
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
are suitable for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
hiring
new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
.
Firstly
, by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
the recruiters can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
an
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
about the personality and social
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
of the potential
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
. In
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
, there is face-to-face interaction, and the candidates
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
answer impromptu questions,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
can judge traits like ability to handle pressure, confidence and ability to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
outside the box

In addition
, although there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
hiring
, none of them could
be considered
superior to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
. One of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
common
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
is the written
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
, which is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
to judge the theoretical knowledge of the person.
However
, this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
cannot give a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
about the personality of the candidates. By contrast, through
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
, employers can judge both the knowledge and temperament of the potential
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employee
.
Moreover
, the written
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
is fallible to cheating as
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sometimes
candidates can take outside
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
.

Another selection process is group discussion, which is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
where a major
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
requirement is conversational and persuasion
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
for instance
sales
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jobs
. They are
really
not suited for technical
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jobs
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
these are not customer oriented. On the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
hold
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
for any type of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
can frame questions to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
the particular
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
they require.

To conclude
, I would like to reiterate that preference for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
hiring
among employers
is justified
as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
have advantages over
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
commonly
adopted
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Interviews from the basic selection criteria for most large companies. However, some people think that an interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagre

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
291 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts