Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Interview forms are the basic selection criteria for the most large companie. However other says that there are other methods also. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Interview forms are the basic selection criteria for the most large companie. However other says that there are other methods also. 6mWBr
In this modern era, many large companies select their staff through interview. While, a few individuals says that taking interview is not a better method for choose their employees and there are another method also opt by the companies. I, however, believe that taking interview is the better way for selection instead of any other methods. At the outset, taking interview is the best way for selection but there are also another method as well. To elaborate, if company taking written test than they also check their employee efficiency and knowledge. Another method is many companies multinational companies should conduct multiple choice questions test for selection their staff through this test companies check the skills, IQ level and so on. For instance, a multinational company, isqub select their approximately 100 employees through written test because it is easy for conduct and also cost effective. Hence, these methods are also better for selection process. However, large companies take interview of their staff for selection purpose. To be specific, if companies should conduct their interview is than interviewer should check the ability, communication skills and so on of their interviewee. This criteria is a reliable method for selection procedure. For an example, a survey was conducted by ' The Tribune ' showed that one - third of large companies conduct interview for selection purpose such as reliance company. Ergo, interview is the better way for select employers. Furthermore, companies take interview because it is the only way where face - to - face communication is possible and it is helpful for check the employees gestures, abilities, skills, intelligence and so on. If face to face communication is conducted then companies can know better about their staff. So, this is the reasons why interview is a reliable method for selecting staff. In conclusion, interview is the better method for selecting staff by companies but there are also another methods advantageous for selection.
In this modern era,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
large
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
select their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
through
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
. While, a few individuals says that taking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is not a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
for choose their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
and there are another
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
also
opt by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
. I,
however
, believe that taking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
way for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
selection
instead
of any other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
. At the outset, taking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is the best way for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
selection
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
there are
also
another
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
as well
. To elaborate, if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
taking written
Use "tester" to make a comparison with this adjective.
test
than they
also
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
check
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employee
efficiency and knowledge. Another
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
multinational
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
should
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
conduct
multiple choice questions
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
test
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
selection
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
through this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
test
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
check
the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
, IQ level and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
on.
For instance
, a multinational
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
,
Possible spelling mistake found.
isqub
select their approximately 100
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
through written
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
test
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it is easy for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
conduct
and
also
cost effective.
Hence
, these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
are
also
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
selection
process.
However
, large
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
take
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
of their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
selection
purpose. To be specific, if
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
should
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
conduct
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is than interviewer should
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
check
the ability, communication
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
on of their interviewee.
Did you mean "these"?
This
criteria
You should probably use: "are".
is
a reliable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
selection
procedure. For an example, a survey
was conducted
by
Don't put a space on both sides of a quote symbol
'
The Tribune
Don't put a space on both sides of a quote symbol
'
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
showed
that one
Consider using an m-dash if you do not want to join two words.
-
third of large
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
conduct
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
selection
purpose such as reliance
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
. Ergo,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
way for select employers.
Furthermore
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
take
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it is the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
way where
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
Consider using an m-dash if you do not want to join two words.
-
to
Consider using an m-dash if you do not want to join two words.
-
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
communication is possible and it is helpful for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
check
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
gestures, abilities,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
, intelligence and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
on. If
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
communication
is conducted
then
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
can know
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
about their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, this is the reasons why
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is a reliable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
for selecting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
.
In conclusion
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
is the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
for selecting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
there are
also
another
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
methods
advantageous for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
selection
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Interview forms are the basic selection criteria for the most large companie. However other says that there are other methods also.

Essay
  American English
1 paragraphs
319 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Interview forms are the basic selection criteria for the most large companie. However other says that there are other methods also. To what extent do you agree or disagree?