Providing internet access to the people in the present society should be paid or free has always been a debatable topic. Even though, many people claim that in today's connected world internet access is a basic need that should be provided free. Others reject this notion and argue that everyone does not deserve internet access. In my opinion, former proposition appears to be more rational. The following essay would further elaborate both sides of the statement with clear examples and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, in fast-growing world internet access should be available to everyone in some form or another. Access to the internet is not only an essential utility for most but also, more importantly, one of the few media which an individual or group can reach out to the world and have their opinions voiced as equal to larger corporations. Moreover, internet acts as a medium for people to act, to discuss, to communicate and to assemble without restriction. For example, the internet is widely used in elementary schools and schools are asking students to have access to the internet at home. Recently, in Japan, the Municipal wireless network which is called Muni WI-FI has been introduced where both public and private sectors are involved to develop a network connection to provide free internet access to everyone.
On the other hand, people believe that everyone does not deserve to access the internet. For example, prisoners should not have access, nor should children who are being punished for bad behavior. It is the responsibility of the person paying for the internet to determine who is accessing the internet.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to the conclusion that access to the internet should be provided free to everyone. In a nutshell, it can be concluded that internet inspires merit, globalization, and sparks new outlooks in individuals
Providing internet
access
to the
people
in the present society should
be paid
or
free
has always been a debatable topic.
Even though
,
many
people
claim that in
today
's connected world internet
access
is a basic need that should
be provided
free
. Others reject this notion and argue that
everyone
does not deserve internet
access
. In my opinion, former proposition appears to be more rational. The following essay would
further
elaborate both sides of the statement with
clear
examples and
thus
lead to a plausible conclusion.
To
begin
with, in
fast
-growing world internet
access
should be available to
everyone
in
some
form or another.
Access
to the internet is not
only
an essential utility for most
but
also
, more
importantly
, one of the few media which an individual or group can reach out to the world and have their opinions voiced as equal to larger corporations.
Moreover
, internet acts as a medium for
people
to act, to discuss, to communicate and to assemble without restriction.
For example
, the internet is
widely
used
in elementary schools and schools are asking students to have
access
to the internet at home. Recently, in Japan, the Municipal wireless network which
is called
Muni
WI-FI has
been introduced
where both public and private sectors
are involved
to develop a network connection to provide
free
internet
access
to everyone.
On the other hand
,
people
believe that
everyone
does not deserve to
access
the internet.
For example
, prisoners should not have
access
, nor should children who are
being punished
for
bad
behavior. It is the responsibility of the person paying for the internet to determine who is accessing the internet.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to the conclusion that
access
to the internet should
be provided
free
to
everyone
. In a nutshell, it can
be concluded
that internet inspires merit, globalization, and sparks new outlooks in
individuals