Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

integrated task... traditional way of voting vs. computers

integrated task. . . traditional way of voting vs. computers WygrK

In the set of material, the reading and the lecture talk about replacing a traditional voting system with a computerized voting system. The article claims that the tradition way of voting has several issues, so it should be replaces with more trust worthy computerized system; it provides three reasons for support the claim. On the other hand, the professor says it’s doubtful that computerized voting will make the situation better and he refuses each reasons mentioned in the passage. Firstly, the author asserts that people accidentally vote for the wrong candidate is the major source of inaccuracy in the traditional voting and computers can use easily. While the professor claims that people who don’t use a computer daily, they will have trouble using computerized voting machines. It may end up in the wrong vote or be discouraged from voting because of fear of technology. Another point mentioned in the article is that the traditional way of voting is rely heavily on people to count the votes and they are more likely to make mistakes. In contrast, the lecture says its true some time human make mistakes in counting, but computers are also human innovation and error caused by computers will be more serious. Result of that, computers may miscount many votes or may permanently remove those from the program. Finally, the passage points that government and every person trust computers for bank transactions and communication, so using it for voting would not be risky. On the other hand the professor posits that the computer used daily for banking and communication purposes and they were not perfect when introduced first, they improves over a time. However, the voting happens one a two years so it is not sufficient to develop confidence to use it.

In the set of material, the reading and the lecture talk about replacing a traditional You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvotepollingballoting
voting
 system with a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withautomateddigital
computerized
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvotepollingballoting
voting
 system. The article claims that the tradition way of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvotepollingballoting
voting
 has several issues, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 it should be Consider using the past participle "replaced"?replaced
replaces
 with more trust worthy You use this word too often, consider replacing it withautomateddigital
computerized
 system; it provides three reasons for support the claim. On the other hand
, the professor says it’s doubtful that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withautomateddigital
computerized
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvotepollingballoting
voting
 will This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 the situation Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).better, and
better and
 he refuses each reasons mentioned in the passage.

Firstly
, the author asserts that This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
accidentally
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtallyreferendumchoicemajoritypollballot
vote
 for the This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:incorrect
wrong
 candidate is the major source of inaccuracy in the traditional You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvotepollingballoting
voting
 and computers can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
easily
. While the professor claims that This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 who don’t This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 a computer daily, they will have trouble using You use this word too often, consider replacing it withautomateddigital
computerized
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvotepollingballoting
voting
 machines. It may This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :expiration
end
 up in the This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:incorrect
wrong
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtallyreferendumchoicemajoritypollballot
vote
 or be discouraged
 from You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvotepollingballoting
voting
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of fear of technology.

Another point mentioned in the article is that the traditional way of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvotepollingballoting
voting
 is Consider using a past participle here: "relied".relied
rely
heavily
 on This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 to count the Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).votes, and
votes and
 they are more likely to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 mistakes. In contrast
, the lecture says its true This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 time human This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 mistakes in counting, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 computers are also
 human innovation and error caused by computers will be more serious. Result of that, computers may miscount This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtallyreferendumchoicemajoritypollballot
votes
 or may permanently
 remove those from the program.

Finally
, the passage points that This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 and every person trust computers for bank transactions and communication, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 using it for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvotepollingballoting
voting
 would not be risky. On the other hand
 the professor posits that the computer This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 daily for banking and communication Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).purposes, and
purposes and
 they were not perfect when introduced first
, they The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: "improve"improve
improves
 over a time. However
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withvotepollingballoting
voting
 happens one a two years This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 it is not sufficient to develop confidence to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 it. 