In US possession of gun is a civil right guarantee by constitution. This right embodies security and freedom. In Poland holding a gun is not popular. In my country the right to possession a gun has civil services like police and army. I would like to explain why easy access to weapons for individuals is dangerous.
First of all, I think that possession of weapons should be only on the basis of a permit. In Poland, obtaining a permit to own a gun is preceded by a long administrative procedure during which the candidate undergoes psychiatric examination. This allows other people to be guaranteed that the person at risk will not receive an additional tool with which will be able to harm other people.
Secondly, the weapon is unsafe tool which should be properly secured. If the weapon is not secured can be used by a person without training or knowledges of its operations for instance by a child. This child can gun down themselves or another person.
What is more, widespread permission to possess a weapon is an indirect acceptance of its use. Violence should not be promoted and accepted. The government should guarantee their citizens safety without necessarily to owning a gun at home.
There is no doubt about it that the people rights are different depending on country’s culture. I understand the need of Americans to own a gun, but I am growing up in country where citizen does not need easy access to gun to be safe and I feel comfortably knowing that only trained people have access to weapons in Poland.
In US possession of
gun
is a civil
right
guarantee by constitution. This
right
embodies security and freedom. In Poland holding a
gun
is not popular. In my country the
right
to possession a
gun
has civil services like police and army. I would like to
explain
why easy access to
weapons
for individuals is
dangerous
.
First of all
, I
think
that possession of
weapons
should be
only
on the basis of a permit. In Poland, obtaining a permit to
own
a
gun
is preceded
by a long administrative procedure during which the candidate undergoes psychiatric examination. This
allows
other
people
to
be guaranteed
that the person at
risk
will not receive an additional tool with which will be able to harm other
people
.
Secondly
, the
weapon
is unsafe tool which should be
properly
secured. If the
weapon
is not secured can be
used
by a person without training or
knowledges
of its operations
for instance
by a child. This child can
gun
down themselves or another person.
What is more
, widespread permission to possess a
weapon
is an indirect acceptance of its
use
. Violence should not
be promoted
and
accepted
. The
government
should guarantee their citizens safety without
necessarily
to owning a
gun
at home.
There is no doubt about it that the
people
rights
are
different
depending on country’s culture. I understand the need of Americans to
own
a
gun
,
but
I am growing up in country where citizen does not need easy access to
gun
to be safe and I feel
comfortably
knowing that
only
trained
people
have access to
weapons
in Poland.